Suppr超能文献

比较抽吸法和拭子法收集的唾液 IgA 分泌率。

Comparison of salivary IgA secretion rate collected by the aspiration method and swab method.

机构信息

Otsu Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 3-31-13 Saigawa Otsu, Shiga 520-0002, Japan ; Otsu Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 3-31-13 Saigawa Otsu, Shiga 520-0002, Japan.

Otsu Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 3-31-13 Saigawa Otsu, Shiga 520-0002, Japan.

出版信息

Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2013;32(3):107-12. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.32.107. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Abstract

Salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) is used as an immunity marker, as saliva can be easily collected, noninvasively with little stress. However, several saliva collection methods can be used. Our comparison between samples collected using different methods demonstrated that the salivary IgA secretion rate in samples collected using an aspiration method was significantly correlated with that in samples collected using a swab method. Moreover, the significant circadian variation in salivary IgA secretion rate in the aspirated saliva suggested that the aspiration method does not suppress salivary IgA secretion rate variability compared with the swab method. Therefore, the aspiration method should be considered as the preferable saliva collection method.

摘要

唾液免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)可用作免疫标志物,因为唾液易于采集,无创且几乎没有压力。但是,可以使用几种唾液采集方法。我们对使用不同方法采集的样本进行比较,结果表明,抽吸法采集的唾液样本中的 IgA 分泌率与拭子法采集的样本中的 IgA 分泌率显著相关。此外,抽吸唾液中 IgA 分泌率的显著昼夜节律变化表明,与拭子法相比,抽吸法不会抑制唾液 IgA 分泌率的变异性。因此,抽吸法应被视为更可取的唾液采集方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4154/4034363/bc6352c4a4ae/bmfh-32-107-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验