Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):1150-67. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12183.
This study examined judgments and reasoning about four parental discipline practices (induction or reasoning and three practices involving “psychological control”; Barber, 1996; two forms of shaming and love withdrawal)among children (7–14 years of age) from urban and rural China and Canada (N = 288) in response to a moral transgression. Children from all settings critically evaluated love withdrawal and preferred induction. Despite being perceived as more common in China than in Canada, with age, parental discipline based on shaming or love withdrawal was increasingly negatively evaluated and believed to have detrimental effects on children’s feelings of self-worth and psychological well-being. Some cultural variations were found in evaluations of practices, perceptions of psychological harm, and attribution of parental goals.
本研究考察了中国城市和农村地区(N=288)以及加拿大的 7-14 岁儿童在面对道德违规行为时,对四种父母管教方式(诱导或说理以及三种涉及“心理控制”的方式;Barber,1996;两种形式的羞辱和爱的撤回)的判断和推理。来自所有环境的儿童都批判性地评价了爱的撤回,并更喜欢诱导。尽管在中国比在加拿大更普遍,但随着年龄的增长,基于羞辱或爱的撤回的父母管教方式越来越受到负面评价,并被认为对孩子的自我价值感和心理健康有不利影响。在对行为的评价、心理伤害的感知以及对父母目标的归因方面,存在一些文化差异。