Khalil Qasim, Gopalswamy Narasimh, Agrawal Sangeeta
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, Dayton, and the Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.
South Med J. 2014 Apr;107(4):225-8. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000092.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy has become the standard procedure for diagnosing esophageal and gastric cancers (EGC) and is considered to have high sensitivity and specificity. To date, few studies have attempted to examine the rates of missed EGC after EGD and no study addresses the rate of missed EGC in a military veteran patient population. This led to us examine missed EGCs at our VA Medical Center across a 10-year period.
An electronic database was used to identify patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 as having EGC. Missed cancers were defined as cancers diagnosed within 1 year of EGD, possible missed cancers as those diagnosed 1 to 3 years after EGD, and latent cancers as those diagnosed between 3 and 5 years after EGD.
A total of 94 patients fulfilled the study criteria: 69 had esophageal cancer and 25 had gastric cancer diagnosed at our institution during the study period. Of the included cases, one patient had a missed cancer (1.06%) and four patients had possible missed cancers (4.26%); no patients had latent cancer.
The true incidence of missed EGC in military veteran patients is not known. It is difficult to compare our findings to those of other studies because of the heterogeneity of studies. Our study echoes the findings of the others: EGD remains an important and effective tool in diagnosing EGC. At the same time, it also points out an important limitation, that EGC can be missed on EGD. Our findings also emphasize the importance of obtaining biopsies of any abnormality and timely clinical follow-up and by repeat EGD as needed.
食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)及活检已成为诊断食管癌和胃癌(EGC)的标准程序,且被认为具有较高的敏感性和特异性。迄今为止,很少有研究试图检查EGD后漏诊EGC的发生率,且尚无研究涉及退伍军人患者群体中EGC的漏诊率。这促使我们对我院退伍军人医疗中心10年间漏诊的EGC进行研究。
使用电子数据库识别2000年至2010年间被诊断为EGC的患者。漏诊癌症定义为在EGD后1年内诊断出的癌症,可能漏诊的癌症为在EGD后1至3年诊断出的癌症,潜在癌症为在EGD后3至5年诊断出的癌症。
共有94例患者符合研究标准:研究期间我院诊断出69例食管癌和25例胃癌。在纳入的病例中,1例患者漏诊癌症(1.06%),4例患者可能漏诊癌症(4.26%);无患者患有潜在癌症。
退伍军人患者中EGC漏诊的真实发生率尚不清楚。由于研究的异质性,很难将我们的研究结果与其他研究的结果进行比较。我们的研究与其他研究结果一致:EGD仍然是诊断EGC的重要且有效的工具。同时,它也指出了一个重要的局限性,即EGD可能会漏诊EGC。我们的研究结果还强调了对任何异常进行活检、及时进行临床随访以及根据需要重复进行EGD的重要性。