Bradford Natalie, Shah Amit J, Usoro Andrew, Haisty Wesley K, Soliman Elsayed Z
Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):131-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu149. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
We examined the prognostic significance of abnormal electrocardiographic QRS transition zone (clockwise and counterclockwise horizontal rotations) in individuals free of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
A total of 5541 adults (age 53 ± 10.4 years, 54% women, 24% non-Hispanic black, 25% Hispanic) without CVD or any major electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities from the US Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included in this analysis. Clockwise and counterclockwise horizontal rotations were defined from standard 12-lead ECG using Minnesota ECG Classification. Mortality and cause of death were assessed through 2006. At baseline, 282 participants had clockwise rotation and 3500 had counterclockwise rotation. During a median follow of 14.6 years, 1229 deaths occurred of which 415 were due to CVD. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis and compared with normal rotation, clockwise rotation was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.43 (1.15-1.78); P = 0.002} and CVD mortality [HR (95% CI): 1.61 (1.09, 2.37) P = 0.016]. In contrast, counterclockwise rotation was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality [HR (95% CI): 0.86 (0.76, 0.97); P = 0.017] and non-significant association with CVD mortality [HR (95% CI): 1.07 (0.86, 1.33); P = 0.549]. These results were consistent in subgroup analysis stratified by age, sex, and race.
In a diverse community-based population free of CVD and compared with normal rotation, clockwise rotation was associated with increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality while counterclockwise rotation was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and non-significant association with CVD mortality. These findings call for attention to these often neglected ECG markers, and probably call for revising the current definition of normal rotation.
我们研究了无心血管疾病(CVD)个体中异常心电图QRS过渡区(顺时针和逆时针水平旋转)的预后意义。
本分析纳入了来自美国第三次国家健康与营养检查调查的5541名无CVD或任何主要心电图(ECG)异常的成年人(年龄53±10.4岁,54%为女性,24%为非西班牙裔黑人,25%为西班牙裔)。使用明尼苏达心电图分类法从标准12导联心电图定义顺时针和逆时针水平旋转。通过2006年评估死亡率和死亡原因。基线时,282名参与者有顺时针旋转,3500名有逆时针旋转。在中位随访14.6年期间,发生了1229例死亡,其中415例死于CVD。在多变量调整后的Cox比例风险分析中,与正常旋转相比,顺时针旋转与全因死亡率增加显著相关{风险比(HR)[95%置信区间(CI)]:1.43(1.15 - 1.78);P = 0.002}和CVD死亡率[HR(95% CI):1.61(1.09,2.37)P = 0.016]。相比之下,逆时针旋转与全因死亡率显著降低相关[HR(95% CI):0.86(0.76,0.97);P = 0.017],与CVD死亡率无显著关联[HR(95% CI):1.07(0.86,1.33);P = 0.549]。这些结果在按年龄、性别和种族分层的亚组分析中是一致的。
在一个无CVD的多样化社区人群中,与正常旋转相比,顺时针旋转与全因和CVD死亡率增加相关,而逆时针旋转与全因死亡率降低相关,与CVD死亡率无显著关联。这些发现需要关注这些经常被忽视的心电图标志物,可能还需要修订当前正常旋转的定义。