Suppr超能文献

不同类型的束支传导阻滞与妇女健康倡议(WHI)研究中心力衰竭事件风险。

Different patterns of bundle-branch blocks and the risk of incident heart failure in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study.

机构信息

Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jul;6(4):655-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000217. Epub 2013 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the risk of incident heart failure (HF) associated with bundle-branch blocks (BBBs) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cox's regression was used to evaluate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for HF among 65975 participants of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study during an average follow-up of 14 years. BBBs observed in 1676 women at baseline were categorized into left, right, and indetermined-type BBBs (LBBB, RBBB, and intraventricular conduction defect, respectively). Compared with women with no BBB, LBBB, and intraventricular conduction defect were strong predictors of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk models (hazard ratio, 3.79; confidence interval, 2.95-4.87 for LBBB and hazard ratio, 3.53; confidence interval, 2.14-5.81 for intraventricular conduction defect). RBBB was not a significant predictor of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk model, but the combination of RBBB and left anterior fascicular block was a strong predictor (hazard ratio, 2.96; confidence interval, 1.77-4.93). QRS duration was an independent predictor of incident HF only in LBBB, with more pronounced risk at QRS ≥ 140 ms than at <140 ms. QRS nondipolar voltage (RNDPV) was an independent predictor in both RBBB and LBBB and, in addition, in LBBB, QRS/STT angle and ST J-point depression in aVL were independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBB, intraventricular conduction defect, and RBBB combined with left anterior fascicular block are strong predictors of incident HF in multivariable-adjusted risk models, but RBBB is not a significant predictor. QRS duration ≥ 140 ms may warrant consideration in LBBB as an indication for further diagnostic evaluation for possible therapeutic and preventive action. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000611.

摘要

背景

我们评估了绝经后女性束支传导阻滞(BBB)与新发心力衰竭(HF)风险的相关性。

方法和结果

Cox 回归用于评估 Women's Health Initiative(WHI)研究 65975 名参与者在平均 14 年随访期间 HF 的风险比及其 95%置信区间。在基线时观察到的 1676 名女性的 BBB 分为左束支、右束支和不确定类型的 BBB(LBBB、RBBB 和室内传导障碍,分别)。与无 BBB 的女性相比,LBBB 和室内传导障碍在多变量校正风险模型中是新发 HF 的强预测因素(风险比,2.95-4.87;风险比,2.14-5.81)。RBBB 在多变量校正风险模型中不是新发 HF 的显著预测因素,但 RBBB 与左前分支阻滞的组合是一个强预测因素(风险比,2.96;置信区间,1.77-4.93)。仅在 LBBB 中,QRS 持续时间是新发 HF 的独立预测因素,在 QRS≥140ms 时比 QRS<140ms 时风险更为显著。在 RBBB 和 LBBB 中,QRS 非双极电压(RNDPV)是独立的预测因素,此外,在 LBBB 中,QRS/STT 角和 aVL 的 ST J 点压低也是独立的预测因素。

结论

LBBB、室内传导障碍和 RBBB 合并左前分支阻滞是多变量校正风险模型中新发 HF 的强预测因素,但 RBBB 不是一个显著的预测因素。在 LBBB 中,QRS 持续时间≥140ms 可能需要考虑进一步的诊断评估,以确定可能的治疗和预防措施。

临床试验注册-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00000611。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/786f/3969232/596472b5dfab/nihms501563f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
What Should Be Done With the Asymptomatic Patient With Right Bundle Branch Block?无症状性右束支传导阻滞患者应如何处理?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e018987. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018987. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验