Obaid Daniel R, Calvert Patrick A, Gopalan Deepa, Parker Richard A, West Nick E J, Goddard Martin, Rudd James H F, Bennett Martin R
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, ACCI, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK; Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB23 3RE, UK.
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB23 3RE, UK.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 May-Jun;8(3):230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 2.
Identifying vulnerable coronary plaque with coronary CT angiography is limited by overlap between attenuation of necrotic core and fibrous plaque. Using x-rays with differing energies alters attenuation values of these components, depending on their material composition.
We sought to determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) improves plaque component discrimination compared with single-energy CT (SECT).
Twenty patients underwent DECT and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS). Attenuation changes at 100 and 140 kV for each plaque component were defined, using 1088 plaque areas co-registered with VH-IVUS. Hounsfield unit thresholds that best detected necrotic core were derived for SECT (conventional attenuation values) and for DECT (using dual-energy indices, defined as difference in Hounsfield unit values at the 2 voltages/their sum). Sensitivity of SECT and DECT to detect plaque components was determined in 77 segments from 7 postmortem coronary arteries. Finally, we examined 60 plaques in vivo to determine feasibility and sensitivity of clinical DECT to detect VH-IVUS-defined necrotic core.
In contrast to conventional SECT, mean dual-energy indices of necrotic core and fibrous tissue were significantly different with minimal overlap of ranges (necrotic core, 0.007 [95% CI, -0.001 to 0.016]; fibrous tissue, 0.028 [95% CI, 0.016-0.050]; P < .0001). DECT increased diagnostic accuracy to detect necrotic core in postmortem arteries (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 98%) compared with SECT (sensitivity, 50%; specificity, 94%). DECT sensitivity to detect necrotic core was lower when analyzed in vivo, although still better than SECT (45% vs 39%).
DECT improves the differentiation of necrotic core and fibrous plaque in ex vivo postmortem arteries. However, much of this improvement is lost when translated to in vivo imaging because of a reduction in image quality.
利用冠状动脉CT血管造影识别易损冠状动脉斑块受到坏死核心和纤维斑块衰减重叠的限制。使用不同能量的X射线会根据这些成分的物质组成改变其衰减值。
我们试图确定与单能量CT(SECT)相比,双能量CT(DECT)是否能改善斑块成分的辨别。
20例患者接受了DECT和虚拟组织学血管内超声(VH-IVUS)检查。利用与VH-IVUS共同配准的1088个斑块区域,确定每个斑块成分在100 kV和140 kV时的衰减变化。得出SECT(传统衰减值)和DECT(使用双能量指数,定义为两个电压下Hounsfield单位值的差值/它们的和)检测坏死核心的最佳Hounsfield单位阈值。在7例尸检冠状动脉的77个节段中确定SECT和DECT检测斑块成分的敏感性。最后,我们对60个斑块进行了体内检查,以确定临床DECT检测VH-IVUS定义的坏死核心的可行性和敏感性。
与传统SECT相比,坏死核心和纤维组织的平均双能量指数有显著差异,范围重叠最小(坏死核心,0.007[95%CI,-0.001至0.016];纤维组织,0.028[95%CI,0.016 - 0.050];P <.0001)。与SECT(敏感性50%;特异性94%)相比,DECT提高了在尸检动脉中检测坏死核心的诊断准确性(敏感性64%;特异性98%)。在体内分析时,DECT检测坏死核心的敏感性较低,尽管仍优于SECT(45%对39%)。
DECT改善了离体尸检动脉中坏死核心和纤维斑块的区分。然而,由于图像质量下降,在转化为体内成像时,这种改善大多丧失。