• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.

作者信息

Stefanidis Dimitrios, Fanelli Robert D, Price Ray, Richardson William

机构信息

Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2257-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6
PMID:24939155
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.SAGES新技术和新技巧引入指南。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2257-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3587-6. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
2
Ongoing evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2014 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.胃肠与内镜手术实践差距的持续演变：美国胃肠与内镜外科医师协会（SAGES）继续教育委员会2014年报告
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3017-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4525-y. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.胃肠外科和内镜手术实践差距的演变：美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会（SAGES）继续教育委员会 2012 年报告。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4429-38. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3263-2. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
4
Ethical considerations regarding the implementation of new technologies and techniques in surgery.关于在外科手术中实施新技术和新方法的伦理考量。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2272-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3644-1. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning.SAGES大学硕士项目：一个旨在促进深思熟虑的终身学习的结构化课程。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3061-3071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5626-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology.SAGES学习中心在引入新技术方面的价值。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Apr;19(4):477-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8928-4. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
7
Colon and rectal surgery.结肠和直肠手术。
Clin Privil White Pap. 2015 Sep(127):1-15.
8
Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy : This privilege guideline was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.授予胃肠内镜检查特权：本特权指南于2007年9月由美国胃肠和内镜外科医师协会（SAGES）理事会审核并批准。它由SAGES指南委员会编写。
Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1349-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9757-7. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
9
A Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection.胃肠与内镜外科医生学会（SAGES）关于临床教育和咨询的封闭式社交媒体（Facebook®）群组的声明：知情同意、患者隐私和外科医生保护问题。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6569-2. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: the challenge and the opportunity.掌握新手术方法和技术中的技能：挑战与机遇。
Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;140(4):387-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.4.387.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring the safe delivery of new invasive interventional procedures and devices: an analysis of NHS organisation policies.监测新型侵入性介入手术和设备的安全交付：对英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）组织政策的分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 15;14(2):e003301. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003301.
2
Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review.检查 IDEAL 框架在创新性介入手术的报告和评估中的应用：系统评价的二次定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 24;14(5):e079654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079654.
3
Assessment of Advanced Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Outcomes for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Delphi Consensus Definition of Diagnostic Yield and Recommendations for Patient-centered Study Designs. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Research Statement.

本文引用的文献

1
SAGES research agenda in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: updated results of a Delphi study.胃肠道与内镜手术领域的SAGES研究议程：德尔菲研究的更新结果
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2763-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3535-5. Epub 2014 May 2.
2
Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?通过模拟器练习，我们能成为更出色的机器人外科医生吗？
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):847-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3231-x.
3
Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.
评估外周肺病变高级诊断性支气管镜检查的结果：诊断产量的德尔福共识定义和以患者为中心的研究设计建议。美国胸科学会/美国胸科学会研究声明的官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):634-646. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0192ST.
4
Enhanced U-Net with GridMask (EUGNet): A Novel Approach for Robotic Surgical Tool Segmentation.带GridMask的增强型U-Net（EUGNet）：一种用于机器人手术工具分割的新方法。
J Imaging. 2023 Dec 18;9(12):282. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9120282.
5
Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review.制定外科创新改良报告的概念框架：范围综述。
BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020.
6
Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能在髋部骨折检测和预后预测中的应用：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233391. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3391.
7
Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies.医疗保健组织对手术创新治理的政策建议：英国国家医疗服务体系政策审查。
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):1004-1012. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac223.
8
Potential Value of Haptic Feedback in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.触觉反馈在深部子宫内膜异位症微创手术中的潜在价值。
Surg Innov. 2020 Dec;27(6):623-632. doi: 10.1177/1553350620944267. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Introduction of new techniques and technologies in surgery: Where is transanal total mesorectal excision today?外科新技术与技术介绍：经肛门全直肠系膜切除术如今处于什么状况？
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May 27;12(5):203-207. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i5.203.
10
Introduction and adoption of innovative invasive procedures and devices in the NHS: an in-depth analysis of written policies and qualitative interviews (the INTRODUCE study protocol).英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）中创新侵入性程序和设备的引入与采用：书面政策及定性访谈的深入分析（INTRODUCE研究方案）
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e029963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029963.
多因素分析机器人辅助肥胖症 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的学习曲线。
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1753-60. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1020-1.
4
Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center.学习微创二尖瓣手术：来自单一高容量中心的 3895 例手术的累积和序贯概率分析。
Circulation. 2013 Jul 30;128(5):483-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001402. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.多标准制定及其在决策工具中的整合以用于医疗技术的采用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(2):246-65. doi: 10.1108/14777261311321806.
6
Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.腹腔镜结直肠手术的学习曲线和病例选择：4852 例的系统回顾和国际多中心分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Dec;55(12):1300-10. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826ab4dd.
7
Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.我们从过去的经验中吸取教训了吗？单孔腹腔镜手术培训的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1478-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
8
Guidelines for providing privileges and credentials to physicians for transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.为医生提供经阴道植入手术网片治疗盆腔器官脱垂的特权和资质的指南。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):194-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31825f36ed.
9
Adoption of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in California: lessons for future dissemination of surgical technology.加利福尼亚州腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术的应用：外科技术未来推广的经验教训
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 May;26(4):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.08.022. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
10
A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment?临床技术评估方法：我们应该如何选择正确的治疗方法？
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.008.