• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人人为我,我为人人:了解健康专业人员在个体在线学习与协作在线学习中的体验。

All for one and one for all: understanding health professionals' experience in individual versus collaborative online learning.

作者信息

MacNeill Heather, Telner Deanna, Sparaggis-Agaliotis Alexandra, Hanna Elizabeth

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Spring;34(2):102-11. doi: 10.1002/chp.21226.

DOI:10.1002/chp.21226
PMID:24939352
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) may facilitate continuing interprofessional education while overcoming barriers of time and place for busy health care professionals. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences, advantages, and challenges of group versus individual online learning.

METHODS

Fifteen multidisciplinary health professionals participated in a 12-week online course on either diabetes or traumatic brain injury. This consisted of background e-modules and a longitudinal build-a-case exercise, done either individually or as a group. Focus group sessions exploring participants' experiences after course completion and at 4 months were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed for recurring themes. Participant reflection homework and video-recorded group sessions were used for triangulation of results.

RESULTS

Individual learners appreciated the flexibility and control, but experienced decreased motivation. Group learners appreciated the immediate feedback from their co-learners and felt social pressure to come to the weekly sessions prepared but expressed challenges in determining group goal-setting for the session. Both groups felt they learned about interprofessional roles; however, group learners described a richer learning experience and understanding of interprofessional roles through the online collaboration exercise. The intense resources necessary for interprofessional CSCL, including time, faculty development, and technological issues, are described.

DISCUSSION

CSCL is a valuable educational strategy in online learning. While individual online learning may be better suited for short and simple educational interventions such as knowledge acquisition, CSCL seems to allow for richer and deeper learning in complex and interprofessional educational experiences. However, strategies, resources, and faculty development required to enhance CSCL need to be addressed carefully.

摘要

引言

计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)可以促进持续的跨专业教育,同时克服忙碌的医疗保健专业人员面临的时间和地点障碍。本研究的目的是了解小组在线学习与个人在线学习的体验、优势和挑战。

方法

15名多学科医疗保健专业人员参加了为期12周的关于糖尿病或创伤性脑损伤的在线课程。该课程包括背景电子模块和一个纵向的病例构建练习,练习可以单独完成,也可以分组完成。在课程结束后和4个月时进行了焦点小组会议,探讨参与者的体验,会议内容被转录并分析以找出反复出现的主题。参与者的反思作业和视频记录的小组会议用于结果的三角验证。

结果

个体学习者欣赏灵活性和自主性,但动力有所下降。小组学习者欣赏来自共同学习者的即时反馈,并感到有社会压力要为每周的课程做好准备,但在确定小组会议的目标设定方面存在挑战。两组都觉得他们了解了跨专业角色;然而,小组学习者通过在线协作练习描述了更丰富的学习体验和对跨专业角色的理解。文中描述了跨专业CSCL所需的大量资源,包括时间、教师发展和技术问题。

讨论

CSCL是在线学习中的一种有价值的教育策略。虽然个人在线学习可能更适合于短期和简单的教育干预,如知识获取,但CSCL似乎能在复杂的跨专业教育体验中实现更丰富、更深入的学习。然而,需要仔细解决增强CSCL所需的策略、资源和教师发展问题。

相似文献

1
All for one and one for all: understanding health professionals' experience in individual versus collaborative online learning.人人为我,我为人人:了解健康专业人员在个体在线学习与协作在线学习中的体验。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Spring;34(2):102-11. doi: 10.1002/chp.21226.
2
Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME.协作式在线学习:远程继续医学教育的新方法。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):928-9.
3
Using Interprofessional Learning for Continuing Education: Development and Evaluation of the Graduate Certificate Program in Health Professional Education for Clinicians.利用跨专业学习进行继续教育:临床医生健康职业教育研究生证书项目的开发与评估
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Summer;36(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000093.
4
Promoting interprofessional understandings through online learning: a qualitative examination.通过在线学习促进跨专业理解:一项质性研究
Nurs Health Sci. 2014 Sep;16(3):321-6. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12105. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
Learning collaborative teamwork: an argument for incorporating the humanities.学习协作团队合作:支持纳入人文学科的理由。
J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov;28(6):519-25. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.915513. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
HEAL: an instructional design model applied to an online clerkship in family medicine.HEAL:一种应用于家庭医学在线临床实习的教学设计模型。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):925-6.
7
A Qualitative Evaluation of an Online Expert-Facilitated Course on Tobacco Dependence Treatment.一项关于烟草依赖治疗在线专家指导课程的定性评估。
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017732967. doi: 10.1177/0046958017732967.
8
eLearning, knowledge brokering, and nursing: strengthening collaborative practice in long-term care.电子学习、知识中介与护理:加强长期护理中的协作实践
Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):264-73. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181ec28b9.
9
UK health-care professionals' experience of on-line learning techniques: a systematic review of qualitative data.英国医疗保健专业人员的在线学习技术体验:定性数据的系统综述
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Fall;29(4):235-41. doi: 10.1002/chp.20041.
10
Outcomes and participant experience of an online train-the-trainer program for Bangladeshi health professionals: a case study evaluation.针对孟加拉国卫生专业人员的在线培训师培训项目的成果与参与者体验:一项案例研究评估
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Winter;35(1):46-56. doi: 10.1002/chp.21262.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes Education Program for Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.护理学生糖尿病教育计划:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Dec;11(12):e70105. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70105.
2
[High interaction potential of online-only courses with breakout sessions-results of a pilot study].[仅在线课程与小组讨论环节的高互动潜力——一项试点研究的结果]
HNO. 2024 Mar;72(3):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01407-6. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Let's Learn Together! A Mixed-Methods Study to Assess Readiness for Interprofessional Education on Practice.
让我们一起学习!一项评估实践中开展跨专业教育准备情况的混合方法研究。
Workplace Health Saf. 2024 Jun;72(6):223-233. doi: 10.1177/21650799231217320. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
4
Publication activities relating to digital teaching and learning in the GMS Journal for Medical Education - a descriptive analysis (1984-2020).在《德中医学教育杂志》中与数字教学相关的出版活动-描述性分析(1984-2020 年)。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;39(5):Doc59. doi: 10.3205/zma001580. eCollection 2022.
5
Using Conjoint Analysis to Investigate Hospital Directors' Preference in Adoption of an Evidence-based Intervention.运用联合分析探究医院院长对采用循证干预措施的偏好。
Int J Healthc Manag. 2021;14(2):328-334. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2019.1645925. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Pilot of a questionnaire study regarding perception of undergraduate medical students towards online classes: Process and perspectives.关于本科医学生对在线课程认知的问卷调查研究试点:过程与观点
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 May;10(5):2016-2021. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2141_20. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Driving quality improvement with a massive open online course (MOOC).利用大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)提高教学质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000781.
8
Green chemistry & chemical stewardship certificate program: a novel, interdisciplinary approach to green chemistry and environmental health education.绿色化学与化学品管理证书项目:一种新颖的、跨学科的绿色化学与环境健康教育方法。
Green Chem Lett Rev. 2019;12(2):178-186. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2019.1609601. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
Toward Optimal Communication About HPV Vaccination for Preteens and Their Parents: Evaluation of an Online Training for Pediatric and Family Medicine Health Care Providers.促进针对青少年及其父母的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的最佳沟通:儿科和家庭医学医疗服务提供者在线培训评估
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Mar/Apr;26(2):159-167. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001022.
10
Interprofessional online learning for primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review.跨专业的初级医疗保健在线学习:综述研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e016872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016872.