College of Nursing and Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.
College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Pusan National University, Pusan, South Korea.
Nurs Open. 2024 Dec;11(12):e70105. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70105.
The purpose of this study was to summarise the current state of the science on diabetes mellitus education programs for nursing students.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, published in English between 2013 and 2022, that examined diabetes education programs for nursing students were considered in the review. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist. Key information such as authors, study focus, population, sample size, details of intervention and control group treatments, outcome variables, and main findings were extracted and summarised in a data extraction form for further analyses and syntheses.
The literature search identified 464 articles, from which 13 studies were evaluated in the systematic review. Most studies (n = 12, 92.3%) used technology-based teaching methods, such as high-fidelity simulations, mobile applications, and virtual reality simulations. Regarding the evaluation of diabetes education program effectiveness, the majority of studies showed significant improvements in knowledge (n = 8, 61.5%), followed by satisfaction with learning (n = 4, 30.8%), nursing skill performance (n = 3, 23.1%), and self-confidence (n = 3, 23.1%) in nursing students. In meta-analyses, technology-based teaching interventions, compared to traditional education, showed no statistically significant improvement in diabetes knowledge (standard mean difference 9.52, 95% CI [-0.18, 19.21], p = 0.05) and self-efficacy (standard mean difference 24.09, 95% CI [-10.75, 58.92], p = 0.18). Despite this, technology-based methods demonstrated favourable effects on knowledge and self-efficacy against traditional education. Findings highlight the importance of emerging technology-based diabetes education programs tailored for nursing students, crucial for enhancing positive educational outcomes. No Patient or Public Contribution.
本研究旨在总结目前针对护理学生的糖尿病教育计划的科学现状。
系统回顾和荟萃分析。
通过检索 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,确定了符合条件的研究。本综述纳入了 2013 年至 2022 年期间以英语发表的、针对护理学生的糖尿病教育计划的随机对照试验和准实验研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估清单评估文章的质量。从文章中提取并总结了作者、研究重点、人群、样本量、干预和对照组治疗的详细信息、结局变量以及主要发现等关键信息,并汇总在数据提取表中,以进行进一步的分析和综合。
文献检索共确定了 464 篇文章,其中 13 项研究在系统评价中进行了评估。大多数研究(n=12,92.3%)使用基于技术的教学方法,如高保真模拟、移动应用程序和虚拟现实模拟。关于糖尿病教育计划效果的评估,大多数研究表明知识方面有显著改善(n=8,61.5%),其次是对学习的满意度(n=4,30.8%)、护理技能表现(n=3,23.1%)和护理学生的自信心(n=3,23.1%)。荟萃分析结果显示,与传统教育相比,基于技术的教学干预措施在糖尿病知识(标准均数差 9.52,95%置信区间[-0.18,19.21],p=0.05)和自我效能(标准均数差 24.09,95%置信区间[-10.75,58.92],p=0.18)方面无统计学意义的改善。尽管如此,基于技术的方法在知识和自我效能方面对传统教育具有有利影响。研究结果强调了为护理学生量身定制的新兴基于技术的糖尿病教育计划的重要性,这对提高积极的教育成果至关重要。无患者或公众贡献。