Drolet Valérie, Vallet Guillaume T, Imbeault Hélène, Lecomte Sarah, Limoges Frédérique, Joubert Sven, Rouleau Isabelle
Département de psychologie et Institut des sciences cognitives, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Centre de Recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal & Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2014 Jun;12(2):218-26. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2014.0469.
The aim of this research was to compare the performances of healthy elderly (n=40) and individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n=40) on the RL/RI 16, a French adaptation of the Free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT) and on the Rey auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT). These two verbal episodic memory tests are frequently used in clinical practice in French-speaking populations. Results showed that the RAVLT demonstrated a slightly better sensitivity and sensibility than the RL/RI 16. The RAVLT allowed to classify participants of the two groups without any overlap. Moreover, no floor effect was observed in the RAVLT in AD and ceiling effects were less pronounced in normal controls that in the RL/RI 16. Results observed in the RL/RI 16 showed important ceiling effects and a decline in performance on free recall throughout trials in AD patients. Nonetheless, the latter tool was less sensitive to recency effects than the RAVLT and may thus provide a more realistic view of the long-term memory performance of these patients. The semantic cues provided in the RL/RI 16 appeared to increase intrusions in AD whereas the interference list in the RAVLT was the first source of false recognitions in both healthy elderly and AD. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates both the advantages and disadvantages of these two tools in the evaluation of episodic memory in elderly with and without cognitive deficits.
本研究的目的是比较健康老年人(n = 40)和阿尔茨海默病(AD,n = 40)患者在RL/RI 16(法语版自由和线索选择性回忆测验(FCSRT))以及雷伊听觉词语学习测验(RAVLT)中的表现。这两项言语情景记忆测验在法语区人群的临床实践中经常使用。结果显示,RAVLT的敏感性和特异性略高于RL/RI 16。RAVLT能够将两组参与者进行分类,且无重叠。此外,在AD患者中RAVLT未观察到地板效应,在正常对照组中天花板效应也比RL/RI 16中更不明显。在RL/RI 16中观察到的结果显示,AD患者存在显著的天花板效应,且在整个试验过程中自由回忆的表现有所下降。尽管如此,后一种工具对近因效应的敏感性低于RAVLT,因此可能更真实地反映这些患者的长期记忆表现。RL/RI 16中提供的语义线索似乎增加了AD患者的侵入错误,而RAVLT中的干扰列表是健康老年人和AD患者错误识别的首要来源。总之,本文证明了这两种工具在评估有无认知缺陷老年人情景记忆方面的优缺点。