慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和健康对照者股四头肌抗阻训练的通气需求
Ventilatory requirements of quadriceps resistance training in people with COPD and healthy controls.
作者信息
Houchen-Wolloff Linzy, Sandland Carolyn J, Harrison Samantha L, Menon Manoj K, Morgan Mike D, Steiner Michael C, Singh Sally J
机构信息
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK ; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
出版信息
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Jun 5;9:589-95. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S59164. eCollection 2014.
BACKGROUND
It is proposed that resistance training (RT) does not activate the cardiopulmonary system to the same extent as whole-body exercise. This is important for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are ventilatory limited.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to assess the ventilatory response to an isokinetic quadriceps RT program in people with COPD and healthy controls.
DESIGN
Observational.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
ISRCTN22764439.
SETTING
Outpatient, university teaching hospital.
PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES
People with COPD (n=14) and healthy controls (n=11) underwent breath-by-breath analysis of their ventilation during an RT session (five sets of 30 maximal knee extensions at 180°/sec). Subjects performed a maximal cycle ergometry test (CET) at baseline. Peak ventilation (VE; L/min) and oxygen consumption (VO2; mL/kg/min) were collected. The same system measured VO2 and VE during the RT session. Parameters are presented as a percentage of the maximal CET. Isokinetic workload, symptom scores, heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation were documented post-training.
RESULTS
People with COPD worked at higher percentages of their maximal capacity than controls (mean range between sets 1-5 for VO2 =49.1%-60.1% [COPD], 45.7%-51.43% [controls] and for VE =57.6%-72.2% [COPD], 49.8%-63.6% [controls]), although this was not statistically significant (P>0.1 in all cases). In absolute terms, the difference between groups was only significant for actual VO2 on set 2 (P<0.05). Controls performed more isokinetic work than patients with COPD (P<0.05). Median Borg symptom scores after RT were the same in both groups (3 breathlessness, 13 exertion), no de-saturation occurred, and both groups were training at ≥65% of their maximum HR.
CONCLUSION
No statistically significant differences were found between people with COPD and healthy controls for VO2 and VE achieved during training. The symptoms associated with training were within acceptable limits.
背景
有人提出,抗阻训练(RT)对心肺系统的激活程度不及全身运动。这对于存在通气受限的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者而言至关重要。
目的
旨在评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和健康对照者对等速股四头肌抗阻训练计划的通气反应。
设计
观察性研究。
注册号
ISRCTN22764439。
地点
大学教学医院门诊。
参与者和观察指标
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(n = 14)和健康对照者(n = 11)在抗阻训练期间(以180°/秒进行五组,每组30次最大程度的膝关节伸展)接受逐次呼吸的通气分析。受试者在基线时进行最大运动负荷蹬车测试(CET)。收集峰值通气量(VE;升/分钟)和耗氧量(VO2;毫升/千克/分钟)。在抗阻训练期间,同一系统测量VO2和VE。参数以最大运动负荷蹬车测试的百分比表示。训练后记录等速运动负荷、症状评分、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度。
结果
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者训练时达到的最大能力百分比高于对照组(第1 - 5组期间VO2的平均范围 = 49.1% - 60.1% [慢性阻塞性肺疾病组],45.7% - 51.43% [对照组];VE的平均范围 = 57.6% - 72.2% [慢性阻塞性肺疾病组],49.8% - 63.6% [对照组]),尽管这在统计学上无显著差异(所有情况下P>0.1)。从绝对值来看,两组之间的差异仅在第2组实际VO2方面具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组完成的等速运动量多于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(P<0.05)。抗阻训练后两组的Borg症状评分中位数相同(呼吸困难评分为3,用力评分为13),未出现血氧饱和度下降,且两组均以≥其最大心率的65%进行训练。
结论
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和健康对照者在训练期间达到的VO2和VE方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。与训练相关的症状在可接受范围内。