Bresalier Michael, Worboys Michael
Br J Hist Sci. 2014 Jun;47(173 Pt 2):305-34. doi: 10.1017/s0007087413000344.
This paper examines the successful campaign in Britain to develop canine distemper vaccine between 1922 and 1933. The campaign mobilized disparate groups around the common cause of using modern science to save the nation's dogs from a deadly disease. Spearheaded by landed patricians associated with the country journal The Field, and funded by dog owners and associations, it relied on collaborations with veterinary professionals, government scientists, the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the commercial pharmaceutical house the Burroughs Wellcome Company (BWC). The social organization of the campaign reveals a number of important, yet previously unexplored, features of interwar science and medicine in Britain. It depended on a patronage system that drew upon a large base of influential benefactors and public subscriptions. Coordinated by the Field Distemper Fund, this system was characterized by close relationships between landed elites and their social networks with senior science administrators and researchers. Relations between experts and non-experts were crucial, with high levels of public engagement in all aspects of research and vaccine development. At the same time, experimental and commercial research supported under the campaign saw dynamic interactions between animal and human medicine, which shaped the organization of the MRC's research programme and demonstrated the value of close collaboration between veterinary and medical science, with the dog as a shared object and resource. Finally, the campaign made possible the translation of 'laboratory' findings into field conditions and commercial products. Rather than a unidirectional process, translation involved negotiations over the very boundaries of the 'laboratory' and the 'field', and what constituted a viable vaccine. This paper suggests that historians reconsider standard historical accounts of the nature of patronage, the role of animals, and the interests of landed elites in interwar British science and medicine.
本文考察了1922年至1933年间在英国开展的成功的犬瘟热疫苗研发运动。该运动围绕着利用现代科学将该国的犬类从一种致命疾病中拯救出来这一共同事业,动员了不同的群体。由与乡村杂志《田野》相关的土地贵族带头,并由犬主和协会提供资金,它依赖于与兽医专业人员、政府科学家、医学研究理事会(MRC)以及商业制药公司宝来惠康公司(BWC)的合作。该运动的社会组织揭示了两次世界大战之间英国科学和医学的一些重要但此前未被探索的特征。它依赖于一个赞助系统,该系统吸引了大量有影响力的赞助者和公众捐款。由犬瘟热基金协调,这个系统的特点是土地精英与其社会网络与高级科学管理人员和研究人员之间的密切关系。专家与非专家之间的关系至关重要,公众在研究和疫苗开发的各个方面都有高度参与。与此同时,在该运动支持下的实验性研究和商业研究见证了动物医学和人类医学之间的动态互动,这塑造了医学研究理事会研究项目的组织,并展示了兽医科学和医学紧密合作的价值,犬类作为一个共享的对象和资源。最后,该运动使“实验室”研究结果转化为实际应用条件和商业产品成为可能。翻译并非一个单向过程,而是涉及到对“实验室”和“实际应用”的界限以及什么构成一种可行疫苗的谈判。本文建议历史学家重新审视关于赞助性质、动物角色以及土地精英在两次世界大战之间英国科学和医学中的利益的标准历史叙述。