Kalimuddin Shirin, Phillips Rachel, Gandhi Mihir, de Souza Nurun Nisa, Low Jenny G H, Archuleta Sophia, Lye David, Tan Thuan Tong
Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Trials. 2014 Jun 19;15:233. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-233.
Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. However, recent consensus guidelines recommend that clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of such infections. The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause 60-day mortality.
METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a multicenter prospective open label phase IIB pilot randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be inpatients over 21-years-old with a positive blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 1.5 ug/ml. Randomization into intervention or active control arms will be performed with a 1:1 allocation ratio. We aim to recruit 50 participants over a period of two years. Participants randomized to the active control arm will receive vancomycin dose-while those randomized to the intervention arm will receive daptomycin. Participants will receive a minimum of 14 days study treatment.The primary analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat principle. The Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the 60-day mortality rate from index blood cultures (primary endpoint) between the two treatment arms, and the exact two-sided 95% confidence interval will be calculated using the Clopper and Pearson method. Primary analysis will be conducted using a two sided alpha of 0.05.
If results from this pilot study suggest that daptomycin shows significant efficacy in the treatment of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, we aim to proceed with a larger scale confirmatory study. This would help guide clinicians and inform practice guidelines on the optimal treatment for such infections.
The trial is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01975662, date of registration: 29 October 2013).
万古霉素是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的标准一线治疗药物。然而,最近的共识指南建议,当万古霉素最低抑菌浓度大于1μg/ml时,临床医生应考虑使用达托霉素等替代药物。然而,迄今为止,尚无直接比较达托霉素和万古霉素治疗此类感染的安全性和疗效的随机试验。我们研究的主要目的是比较达托霉素与万古霉素在治疗万古霉素最低抑菌浓度较高(大于或等于1.5μg/ml)的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株所致血流感染时,降低全因60天死亡率方面的疗效。
方法/设计:本研究设计为一项多中心前瞻性开放标签IIB期试点随机对照试验。符合条件的参与者将是年龄超过21岁、血培养耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌呈阳性且万古霉素最低抑菌浓度大于或等于1.5μg/ml的住院患者。将以1:1的分配比例随机分为干预组或活性对照组。我们的目标是在两年内招募50名参与者。随机分配到活性对照组的参与者将接受万古霉素治疗,而随机分配到干预组的参与者将接受达托霉素治疗。参与者将接受至少14天的研究治疗。主要分析将基于意向性原则进行。将使用Fisher精确检验比较两个治疗组之间指数血培养的60天死亡率(主要终点),并使用Clopper和Pearson方法计算精确的双侧95%置信区间。主要分析将使用双侧α为0.05进行。
如果这项试点研究的结果表明,达托霉素在治疗万古霉素最低抑菌浓度较高的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株所致血流感染方面显示出显著疗效,我们的目标是进行更大规模的验证性研究。这将有助于指导临床医生并为关于此类感染的最佳治疗的实践指南提供信息。
该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上列出(NCT0********,注册日期:2013年10月29日)。