• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热带国家中三种口服补液策略治疗急性腹泻的比较

Comparison of three oral rehydration strategies in the treatment of acute diarrhea in a tropical country.

作者信息

Pignatelli Salvatore, Musumeci Salvatore

机构信息

Saint Camille Medical Center, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Departments of Pharmacology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Pediatrics, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy ; Institute of Population Genetics, National Research Council, Alghero, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Mar;64(3):189-202. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00021-3.

DOI:10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00021-3
PMID:24944365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of hydrating solutions and early refeeding improve recovery for infants and children with diarrhea.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a low-osmolarity (30 mEq/L Na(+)) solution administered after the standard, high-osmolarity (90 mEq/L Na(+)) solution via a nasogastric tube (NGT) and followed by early refeeding to achieve more rapid body weight recovery in infants and children with acute diarrhea.

METHODS

Infants and children aged <5 years with acute diarrhea and dehydration (body weight loss of ≥10%) observed from January to August 2001 at Saint Camille Medical Center, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment protocols. Patients in group A received, via NGT, rehydration with a high-osmolarity solution for 3 hours, followed by a low-osmolarity solution for at least 3 additional hours. Patients in group B were given only a low-osmolarity solution via NGT. In group C, rehydration was carried out using a high-osmolarity solution via NGT.

RESULTS

Four thousand consecutively treated infants and children (2010 boys, 1990 girls; mean [SD] age, 3.5 [2.7] years) were enrolled. After the first 6 hours of infusion, 90% of the patients who had received the combined rehydration (group A) showed significant body weight recovery, versus 80% and 79% of the patients in groups B and C, respectively. Stool output significantly decreased for group A compared with groups B and C (114 vs 125 and 120 g/kg, respectively). Only 7% of the patients in group A required prolonged rehydration (>6 hours) with the low-osmolarity solution, versus 10% and 12% in groups B and C, respectively. A total of 3% of patients treated with combined rehydration required hospitalization, compared with 10% and 9% in groups B and C, respectively. At the end of infusion, 25% of the patients rehydrated only with a low-osmolarity solution showed poor body weight recovery and appeared lethargic, versus 10% in group A and 15% in group C. Patients who were rehydrated with a high-osmolarity solution showed symptoms of hypernatremia (serum Na(+) concentration >140 mEq/L). At the end of rehydration (≥6 hours), all patients recovered their previous body weight, partially or totally, and refeeding was begun. Rehydration and diet were continued at home, or in neighboring areas for those living far away.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study population, the administration of a high-osmolarity solution followed by a low-osmolarity solution and early refeeding was effective in the treatment of acute diarrhea and was well tolerated.

摘要

背景

给予补液溶液和早期重新喂养可改善腹泻婴幼儿的恢复情况。

目的

本研究旨在评估通过鼻胃管(NGT)在标准高渗溶液(90 mEq/L Na⁺)之后给予低渗溶液(30 mEq/L Na⁺)并随后进行早期重新喂养,以实现急性腹泻婴幼儿更快体重恢复的疗效。

方法

纳入2001年1月至8月在布基纳法索瓦加杜古圣卡米尔医疗中心观察到的年龄小于5岁、患有急性腹泻和脱水(体重减轻≥10%)的婴幼儿。患者被随机分为3种治疗方案之一。A组患者通过NGT先接受高渗溶液补液3小时,随后再接受低渗溶液至少3小时。B组患者仅通过NGT给予低渗溶液。C组患者通过NGT使用高渗溶液进行补液。

结果

共纳入4000例连续接受治疗的婴幼儿(2010例男孩,1990例女孩;平均[标准差]年龄为3.5[2.7]岁)。输注开始后的前6小时,接受联合补液(A组)的患者中有90%体重显著恢复,而B组和C组分别为80%和79%。与B组和C组相比,A组的粪便排出量显著减少(分别为114 g/kg vs 125 g/kg和120 g/kg)。A组仅7%的患者需要用低渗溶液延长补液时间(>6小时),而B组和C组分别为10%和12%。接受联合补液治疗的患者中共有3%需要住院,而B组和C组分别为10%和9%。输注结束时,仅用低渗溶液补液的患者中有25%体重恢复不佳且显得嗜睡,而A组为10%,C组为15%。用高渗溶液补液的患者出现高钠血症症状(血清Na⁺浓度>140 mEq/L)。补液结束时(≥6小时),所有患者均部分或完全恢复了之前的体重,并开始重新喂养。补液和饮食在患者家中继续进行,对于住得较远的患者则在邻近地区继续。

结论

在本研究人群中,先给予高渗溶液再给予低渗溶液并早期重新喂养对急性腹泻的治疗有效且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three oral rehydration strategies in the treatment of acute diarrhea in a tropical country.热带国家中三种口服补液策略治疗急性腹泻的比较
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Mar;64(3):189-202. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00021-3.
2
A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.一项双盲临床试验,比较世界卫生组织口服补液盐与含有等量钠和葡萄糖的低渗溶液。
J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70426-2.
3
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea.多中心、随机、双盲临床试验,以评估低渗口服补液盐溶液治疗儿童急性水样腹泻的疗效和安全性。
Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):613-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.613.
4
Efficacy of standard glucose-based and reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin-based oral rehydration solutions: effect of sugar malabsorption.基于标准葡萄糖和低渗麦芽糊精的口服补液溶液的疗效:糖吸收不良的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(5):471-7.
5
Effectiveness of nasogastric rehydration in hospitalized children with acute diarrhea.鼻胃管补液对住院急性腹泻患儿的有效性。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995 Aug;21(2):145-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199508000-00004.
6
Hypernatremic diarrheal dehydration treated with oral glucose-electrolyte solution containing 90 or 75 mEq/L of sodium.用含90或75毫当量/升钠的口服葡萄糖电解质溶液治疗高钠血症性腹泻脱水。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Sep-Oct;7(5):694-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198809000-00013.
7
Comparison of efficacy of a glucose/glycine/glycylglycine electrolyte solution versus the standard WHO/ORS in diarrheic dehydrated children.葡萄糖/甘氨酸/甘氨酰甘氨酸电解质溶液与标准世界卫生组织口服补液盐对腹泻脱水儿童疗效的比较。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):882-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198811000-00016.
8
Outpatient rapid intravenous rehydration to correct dehydration and resolve vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis.门诊快速静脉补液以纠正急性胃肠炎患儿的脱水并缓解呕吐。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;28(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70032-x.
9
Impact of rice based oral rehydration solution on stool output and duration of diarrhoea: meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials.基于大米的口服补液溶液对粪便排出量和腹泻持续时间的影响:13项临床试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 1992 Feb 1;304(6822):287-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6822.287.
10
Lactobacillus GG administered in oral rehydration solution to children with acute diarrhea: a multicenter European trial.口服补液溶液中添加鼠李糖乳杆菌GG治疗儿童急性腹泻:一项欧洲多中心试验。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 Jan;30(1):54-60. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200001000-00018.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review.低渗口服补液盐治疗儿童腹泻所致脱水:系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):81-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.81.
2
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea.多中心、随机、双盲临床试验,以评估低渗口服补液盐溶液治疗儿童急性水样腹泻的疗效和安全性。
Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):613-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.613.
3
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.报告随机试验的修订版CONSORT声明:解释与详述。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012.
4
Effectiveness of forced rehydration and early re-feeding in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in a tropical area.
Minerva Pediatr. 2000 Jul-Aug;52(7-8):357-66.
5
Controlled trial of hypo-osmalar versus World Health Organization oral rehydration solution.低渗溶液与世界卫生组织口服补液盐的对照试验。
Indian Pediatr. 2000 Sep;37(9):952-60.
6
Efficacy and safety of oral rehydration solution with reduced osmolarity in adults with cholera: a randomised double-blind clinical trial. CHOICE study group.低渗口服补液盐在成人霍乱患者中的疗效与安全性:一项随机双盲临床试验。CHOICE研究组
Lancet. 1999 Jul 24;354(9175):296-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09332-5.
7
Enhancing clinical efficacy of oral rehydration therapy: is low osmolality the key?提高口服补液疗法的临床疗效:低渗透压是关键吗?
Gastroenterology. 1998 Jan;114(1):197-210. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70647-x.
8
Treating diarrhoea. Rehydration should have been emphasised.治疗腹泻。补液本应得到强调。
BMJ. 1997 Nov 22;315(7119):1378.
9
A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.一项双盲临床试验,比较世界卫生组织口服补液盐与含有等量钠和葡萄糖的低渗溶液。
J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70426-2.
10
Clinical experience with a hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea.低渗口服补液溶液治疗急性腹泻的临床经验
Acta Paediatr. 1993 Jan;82(1):52-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12516.x.