Miller Sharon, Zhang Yang
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Neurobehavioral Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Aug 8;577:51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) collected from cochlear implant (CI) users are often contaminated by large electrical device-related artifacts. Using independent component analysis (ICA), the artifacts can be manually identified and removed, and the ERP responses can be reconstructed from the remaining components. Viola et al. [17] recently developed an efficient algorithm that uses spatial and temporal statistics of the components to automate CI artifact removal. The purpose of this study was to perform an independent validation of the algorithm. We further assessed whether the ERP responses were stable over the course of one year when analyzed manually or using the semi-automated approach. To achieve these aims, we collected EEG data from 6 adult CI users at two sessions, with one year between each session. We compared their ERP responses reconstructed using the algorithm and the manual approach. We found no significant differences when comparing the two approaches to removing CI artifact across sessions, validating the use of the semi-automated method.
从人工耳蜗(CI)使用者收集的听觉事件相关电位(ERP)常常受到与大型电气设备相关的伪迹的污染。使用独立成分分析(ICA),可以手动识别并去除这些伪迹,并且可以从其余成分中重建ERP反应。维奥拉等人[17]最近开发了一种高效算法,该算法利用成分的空间和时间统计信息来自动去除CI伪迹。本研究的目的是对该算法进行独立验证。我们进一步评估了在手动分析或使用半自动方法分析时,ERP反应在一年的时间里是否稳定。为实现这些目标,我们在两个时间段收集了6名成年CI使用者的脑电图(EEG)数据,每个时间段相隔一年。我们比较了使用该算法和手动方法重建的ERP反应。在比较跨时间段去除CI伪迹的两种方法时,我们未发现显著差异,从而验证了半自动方法的使用。