Bader Regine, Opitz Bertram, Reith Wolfgang, Mecklinger Axel
Experimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany; Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Square J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany.
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:123-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Recollection, an effortful process relying on the integrity of a brain network including the hippocampus, is generally required to remember arbitrary associations whereas a simple familiarity signal arising in the perirhinal cortex is sufficient to recognize single items. However, the integration of separate items into a single configuration (unitization) leads to reduced involvement of recollection and greater reliance on familiarity. This seems to imply that unitized associations are processed similar to single items. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the effects of unitization as encoding strategy on retrieval processes in a between-group-design. A definition was provided that allows combining two unrelated words into a novel conceptual unit (e.g., milk taxi = a delivery service, which is directly dispatched from a farm). We compared this to an encoding strategy in which the words were studied as parts of a sentence. We included pairs in reversed order at test because reversing a unitized word pair is assumed to disrupt the unit while leaving item familiarity for the single constituents intact. This enabled us to compare recognition memory for novel units and single items. Sentence encoding led to a flexible recruitment of brain areas previously associated with recollection, irrespective of the order of the test pair. Unitization encoding reduced the involvement of the recollection network and specifically engaged regions within the parahippocampal cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex for novel units. In contrast, recognition of reversed pairs involved activation of BA 45 in the left inferior frontal gyrus. This possibly suggests that familiarity for novel units and single items are associated with different brain networks.
回忆是一个依赖包括海马体在内的大脑网络完整性的费力过程,通常需要回忆才能记住任意关联,而嗅周皮质中产生的简单熟悉信号就足以识别单个项目。然而,将单独的项目整合为一个单一结构(单元化)会导致回忆的参与度降低,并更依赖于熟悉度。这似乎意味着单元化关联的处理方式与单个项目类似。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像,在组间设计中研究了单元化作为编码策略对检索过程的影响。我们给出了一个定义,它允许将两个不相关的词组合成一个新的概念单元(例如,牛奶出租车 = 一种直接从农场派遣的送货服务)。我们将其与一种将单词作为句子一部分进行学习的编码策略进行了比较。我们在测试中纳入了顺序颠倒的词对,因为颠倒单元化的词对被认为会破坏该单元,同时保持单个成分的项目熟悉度不变。这使我们能够比较对新单元和单个项目的识别记忆。句子编码导致灵活招募先前与回忆相关的脑区,而与测试词对的顺序无关。单元化编码减少了回忆网络的参与度,并特别激活了海马旁皮质和内侧前额叶皮质中与新单元相关的区域。相比之下,对颠倒词对的识别涉及左侧额下回BA 45的激活。这可能表明对新单元和单个项目的熟悉度与不同的脑网络相关。