Nisén Jessica, Myrskylä Mikko, Silventoinen Karri, Martikainen Pekka
a University of Helsinki.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2014;68(3):321-37. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2014.913807. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
An inverse association between education and fertility in women has been found in many societies but the causes of this association remain inadequately understood. We investigated whether observed and unobserved family-background characteristics explained educational differences in lifetime fertility among 35,212 Finnish women born in 1940-50. Poisson and logistic regression models, adjusted for measured socio-demographic family-background characteristics and for unobserved family characteristics shared by siblings, were used to analyse the relationship between education and the number of children, having any children, and fertility beyond the first child. The woman's education and the socio-economic position of the family were negatively associated with fertility. Observed family characteristics moderately (3-28 per cent) explained the association between education and fertility, and results from models including unobserved characteristics supported this interpretation. The remaining association may represent a causal relationship between education and fertility or joint preferences that form independently of our measures of background.
在许多社会中都发现女性的教育程度与生育能力之间存在负相关,但这种关联的原因仍未得到充分理解。我们调查了观察到的和未观察到的家庭背景特征是否能解释1940年至1950年出生的35212名芬兰女性在终身生育方面的教育差异。使用泊松回归模型和逻辑回归模型,对测量的社会人口家庭背景特征以及兄弟姐妹共有的未观察到的家庭特征进行调整,以分析教育与子女数量、是否有子女以及头胎之后的生育能力之间的关系。女性的教育程度与家庭的社会经济地位与生育能力呈负相关。观察到的家庭特征适度地(3%至28%)解释了教育与生育能力之间的关联,包含未观察到特征的模型结果支持了这一解释。其余的关联可能代表教育与生育能力之间的因果关系,或者是独立于我们的背景测量而形成的共同偏好。