Buelow Melissa T
The Ohio State University at Newark, OH, USA
Assessment. 2015 Apr;22(2):178-87. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539383. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Behavioral measures of risky decision making are frequently used by researchers and clinicians; however, most of these measures are strongly associated with personality characteristics and state mood. The present study sought to examine personality, mood, and executive function predictors of performance on a newer measure of decision making, the Columbia Card Task (CCT). Participants were 489 undergraduate students who completed either the hot or cold version of the CCT as well as measures of state mood, impulsive sensation seeking, behavioral inhibition and activation systems, and executive functions (Wisconsin Card Sort Task; Digit Span). Results indicated that performance on the CCT-cold was predicted by Wisconsin Card Sort Task errors, and Digit Span predicted the CCT-hot. In addition, significant correlations were found between the CCT information use variables and the predictor variables. Implications for the utility of the CCT as a clinical instrument and its relationship with other measures of decision making are discussed.
研究人员和临床医生经常使用风险决策的行为测量方法;然而,这些测量方法大多与人格特征和状态情绪密切相关。本研究旨在考察人格、情绪和执行功能对一种更新的决策测量方法——哥伦比亚卡片任务(CCT)表现的预测作用。参与者为489名本科生,他们完成了CCT的热版或冷版,以及状态情绪、冲动性寻求刺激、行为抑制和激活系统,和执行功能(威斯康星卡片分类任务;数字广度)的测量。结果表明,威斯康星卡片分类任务错误可预测CCT冷版的表现,数字广度可预测CCT热版的表现。此外,CCT信息使用变量与预测变量之间存在显著相关性。本文讨论了CCT作为临床工具的效用及其与其他决策测量方法的关系。