Bonilha Heather Shaw, Simpson Annie N, Ellis Charles, Mauldin Patrick, Martin-Harris Bonnie, Simpson Kit
Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA,
Dysphagia. 2014 Oct;29(5):545-52. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9543-8. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
With the recent emphasis on evidence-based practice and healthcare reform, understanding the cost of dysphagia management has never been more important. It is helpful for clinicians to understand and objectively report the costs associated with dysphagia when they advocate for their services in this economy. Having carefully estimated cost of illness, inputs are needed for cost-effectiveness analyses that help support the value of treatments. This study sought to address this issue by examining the 1-year cost associated with a diagnosis of dysphagia post-stroke in South Carolina. Furthermore, this study investigated whether ethnicity and residence differences exist in the cost of dysphagia post-stroke. Data on 3,200 patients in the South Carolina Medicare database from 2004 who had ICD-9 codes for ischemic stroke, 434 and 436, were retrospectively included in this study. Differences between persons with and without dysphagia post-stroke were compared with respect to age, gender, ethnicity, mortality, length of stay, comorbidity, rurality, discharge disposition, and cost to Medicare. Univariate analyses and a gamma-distributed generalized linear multivariable model with a log link function were completed. We found that the 1-year cost to Medicare for persons with dysphagia post ischemic stroke was $4,510 higher than that for persons without dysphagia post ischemic stroke when controlling for age, comorbidities, ethnicity, and proportion of time alive. Univariate analysis revealed that rurality, ethnicity, and gender were not statistically significantly different in comparisons of individuals with or without dysphagia post-stroke. Post-stroke dysphagia significantly increases post-stroke medical expenses. Understanding the expenditures associated with post-stroke dysphagia is helpful for optimal allocation and use of resources. Such information is needed to conduct cost-effectiveness studies.
随着近期对循证医学实践和医疗改革的重视,了解吞咽困难管理的成本变得前所未有的重要。对于临床医生来说,在当前经济形势下宣传其服务时,了解并客观报告与吞咽困难相关的成本是很有帮助的。在仔细估算疾病成本之后,还需要投入进行成本效益分析,以支持治疗的价值。本研究旨在通过调查南卡罗来纳州中风后吞咽困难诊断的1年成本来解决这一问题。此外,本研究还调查了中风后吞咽困难成本在种族和居住地区方面是否存在差异。本研究回顾性纳入了2004年南卡罗来纳州医疗保险数据库中3200例患有缺血性中风ICD-9编码(434和436)的患者。比较了中风后有和没有吞咽困难的患者在年龄、性别、种族、死亡率、住院时间、合并症、农村地区、出院处置以及医疗保险费用方面的差异。完成了单因素分析和具有对数链接函数的伽马分布广义线性多变量模型。我们发现,在控制年龄、合并症、种族和存活时间比例后,缺血性中风后有吞咽困难的患者1年的医疗保险费用比没有吞咽困难的患者高4510美元。单因素分析显示,农村地区、种族和性别在中风后有或没有吞咽困难的个体比较中没有统计学上的显著差异。中风后吞咽困难显著增加了中风后的医疗费用。了解与中风后吞咽困难相关的支出有助于资源的优化分配和使用。进行成本效益研究需要此类信息。