• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对医院病例进行护理质量记录审查的方法。

A methodology for targeting hospital cases for quality of care record reviews.

作者信息

Hannan E L, Bernard H R, O'Donnell J F, Kilburn H

机构信息

Bureau of Health Care Research and Information Services, New York State Department of Health, Albany 12237.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1989 Apr;79(4):430-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.4.430.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.79.4.430
PMID:2494893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1349969/
Abstract

We tested the efficacy of selected case characteristics in targeting quality of care problems for medical record review. The case characteristics, all of which apply to patients who die in a hospital, consist primarily of procedures and DRGs (diagnosis-related groups) for which death rarely occurs, and a set of complications of surgical care. All characteristics are obtainable from combinations of the principal and secondary diagnoses and procedures in the case, and are available from discharge abstracts. The presence of a quality of care problem is confirmed through a review of the medical record by a nurse and two or more physicians. A logistic regression model that controls for various patient and hospital variables is used as a measure of each of the proposed case characteristics. The results indicate that most of the characteristics are associated with higher percentages of quality of care problems than cases chosen at random, and that the methodology has promise as a tool for targeting cases for medical record review.

摘要

我们测试了选定病例特征在针对医疗记录审查中的护理质量问题方面的有效性。这些病例特征主要包括死亡极少发生的手术和诊断相关分组(DRG),以及一组手术护理并发症,所有这些特征均适用于在医院死亡的患者。所有特征均可从病例中的主要和次要诊断及手术的组合中获取,并且可从出院摘要中获得。护理质量问题的存在通过一名护士和两名或更多医生对医疗记录的审查得以确认。使用一个控制各种患者和医院变量的逻辑回归模型来衡量每个提议的病例特征。结果表明,与随机选择的病例相比,大多数特征与更高比例的护理质量问题相关,并且该方法有望作为一种针对医疗记录审查病例的工具。

相似文献

1
A methodology for targeting hospital cases for quality of care record reviews.一种针对医院病例进行护理质量记录审查的方法。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Apr;79(4):430-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.4.430.
2
Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.利用行政数据查找不合格护理:并发症筛查项目的验证
Med Care. 2000 Aug;38(8):796-806. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00004.
3
Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality.显性与隐性评估之间的差异:医生和护士对并发症及质量的评估
Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):483-98. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.033.
4
Managing quality in hospital practice.医院实践中的质量管控
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):295-302. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.295.
5
An audit of the quality of deployed DMICP records on Operation HERRICK 14.
J R Army Med Corps. 2012 Sep;158(3):213-6. doi: 10.1136/jramc-158-03-13.
6
[Quality of medical database to valorize the DRG model by ISA cost indicators].[通过国际疾病分类(ISA)成本指标评估疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)模型的医学数据库质量]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2002 Dec;50(6):593-603.
7
The quality of abstracting medical information from the medical record: the impact of training programmes.从病历中提取医学信息的质量:培训计划的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):209-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.209.
8
[Audit as a tool to assess and promote the quality of medical records and hospital appropriateness: metodology and preliminary results].[审计作为评估和提升病历质量及医院适宜性的工具:方法与初步结果]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2015 Mar-Apr;71(2):139-56.
9
Targeting ambulatory care cases for risk management and quality management.针对门诊护理病例进行风险管理和质量管理。
Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):66-75.
10
Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.手术医院病历记录审核(SHARK)——一种改进手术病历记录的新审核工具。
J Surg Educ. 2013 May-Jun;70(3):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data.剖腹术后切口裂开:一种有用的医疗保健质量指标?基于挪威医院管理数据的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e026422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026422.
2
The occurrence of adverse events in low-risk non-survivors in pediatric intensive care patients: an exploratory study.儿科重症监护患者低危未存活者中不良事件的发生:一项探索性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;177(9):1351-1358. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3194-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?常规数据:临床审计的一种资源?
Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):104-11. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.104.
4
Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough?利用医疗保险理赔数据评估冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)手术的医疗服务质量:其效果是否足够好?
Health Serv Res. 1997 Feb;31(6):659-78.
5
Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources.比较实施冠状动脉搭桥手术的医院:结果指标和数据来源的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Oct;84(10):1609-14. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1609.
6
Identifying complications and low provider adherence to normative practices using administrative data.利用行政数据识别并发症和医疗服务提供者对规范做法的低依从性。
Health Serv Res. 1995 Oct;30(4):531-54.
7
Assessing quality of care: another step forward.评估医疗质量:又向前迈进了一步。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Apr;79(4):415-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.4.415.
8
Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.患者预后研究团队与医疗保健政策和研究机构。
Health Serv Res. 1990 Dec;25(5):697-708.

本文引用的文献

1
Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs?基于诊断相关分组的付费方式能控制医院成本吗?
N Engl J Med. 1984 Aug 2;311(5):295-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408023110505.
2
Does practice make perfect? Part II: The relation between volume and outcomes and other hospital characteristics.熟能生巧吗?第二部分:手术量与手术结果及其他医院特征之间的关系。
Med Care. 1984 Feb;22(2):115-25.
3
Small area variations in health care delivery.医疗服务中的小区域差异。
Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102-8. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1102.
4
Which rate is right?
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 30;314(5):310-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601303140509.
5
Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).医院间疾病严重程度的差异。基于诊断相关分组(DRGs)的前瞻性支付存在的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 4;313(1):20-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198507043130105.
6
Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients.与外科手术患者死亡率相关的医生和医院因素。
Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9):785-800. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198609000-00001.
7
Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals.外科医生手术量和医院手术量对医院医疗质量的影响。
Med Care. 1987 Jun;25(6):489-503. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198706000-00004.
8
Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality?医院住院患者死亡率。它是质量的预测指标吗?
N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 24;317(26):1674-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712243172626.
9
Adjusted hospital death rates: a potential screen for quality of medical care.调整后的医院死亡率:医疗质量的潜在筛查指标。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Sep;77(9):1162-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.9.1162.
10
MEDISGRPS: a clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission.
Inquiry. 1985 Winter;22(4):377-87.