Eastern Regional Office, USDA Forest Service, 626 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53202, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jan;21(1):314-34. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12663. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
Many ecological phenomena combine to direct vegetation trends over time, with climate and disturbance playing prominent roles. To help decipher their relative importance during Euro-American times, we employed a unique approach whereby tree species/genera were partitioned into temperature, shade tolerance, and pyrogenicity classes and applied to comparative tree-census data. Our megadata analysis of 190 datasets determined the relative impacts of climate vs. altered disturbance regimes for various biomes across the eastern United States. As the Euro-American period (ca. 1500 to today) spans two major climatic periods, from Little Ice Age to the Anthropocene, vegetation changes consistent with warming were expected. In most cases, however, European disturbance overrode regional climate, but in a manner that varied across the Tension Zone Line. To the north, intensive and expansive early European disturbance resulted in the ubiquitous loss of conifers and large increases of Acer, Populus, and Quercus in northern hardwoods, whereas to the south, these disturbances perpetuated the dominance of Quercus in central hardwoods. Acer increases and associated mesophication in Quercus-Pinus systems were delayed until mid 20th century fire suppression. This led to significant warm to cool shifts in temperature class where cool-adapted Acer saccharum increased and temperature neutral changes where warm-adapted Acer rubrum increased. In both cases, these shifts were attributed to fire suppression rather than climate change. Because mesophication is ongoing, eastern US forests formed during the catastrophic disturbance era followed by fire suppression will remain in climate disequilibrium into the foreseeable future. Overall, the results of our study suggest that altered disturbance regimes rather than climate had the greatest influence on vegetation composition and dynamics in the eastern United States over multiple centuries. Land-use change often trumped or negated the impacts of warming climate, and needs greater recognition in climate change discussions, scenarios, and model interpretations.
许多生态现象共同作用,引导着植被随时间推移的变化趋势,其中气候和干扰是两个重要因素。为了帮助我们在欧洲-美国时期理解它们的相对重要性,我们采用了一种独特的方法,即将树种/属分为温度、耐荫性和火生性类别,并应用于比较树木普查数据。通过对 190 个数据集的元数据分析,我们确定了气候和改变的干扰模式对美国东部不同生物群落的相对影响。由于欧洲-美国时期(约 1500 年至今日)跨越了两个主要气候期,从小冰期到人类世,预计植被变化与变暖一致。然而,在大多数情况下,欧洲的干扰超过了区域气候,但在张力带线的各个地方方式不同。在北部,早期欧洲的密集和广泛干扰导致北方硬木中普遍失去针叶树,并使 Acer、Populus 和 Quercus 大量增加,而在南部,这些干扰使 Quercus 在中部硬木中保持优势。Acer 的增加和与 Quercus-Pinus 系统相关的中生变化直到 20 世纪中叶的火灾抑制才得以延迟。这导致了温度类别的显著暖化到冷化转变,其中冷适应 Acer saccharum 增加,而暖适应 Acer rubrum 则发生中性变化。在这两种情况下,这些变化都归因于火灾抑制而不是气候变化。由于中生化仍在进行中,在美国东部,在灾难性干扰时期形成的森林随后受到火灾抑制的影响,将在可预见的未来保持气候失衡状态。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在多个世纪的时间里,改变的干扰模式而不是气候对美国东部的植被组成和动态变化产生了最大的影响。土地利用变化常常超过或否定了气候变暖的影响,在气候变化讨论、情景和模型解释中需要给予更大的重视。