• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[手辅助腹腔镜手术、腹腔镜手术及开放手术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效比较]

[Comparison of short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer].

作者信息

Ju Haixing, Huang Xin, Zhu Yuping, Feng Haiyang, Li Dechuan

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Cancer Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;17(6):574-7.

PMID:24953365
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for hand-assisted, laparoscopic, and open resection for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between June 2009 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified into a hand-assisted group (HALS, n=101), a laparoscopic surgery group (LS, n=157), and an open surgery group (OS, n=132). Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative morbidity, pathological results and length of recovery were compared among three groups.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was (173±39) min for the HALS group, (231±61) min for the LS group, and (173±39) min for the OS group (P<0.01). Conversion rates did not differ between HALS and LS groups (2.0% vs 3.2%, P=0.708). The overall complication rates were 11.9%, 11.5%, and 19.7% in the HALS, LS and OS groups respectively (P=0.100). The specimen quality with a specimen length, distal resection margin, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes did not differ among the three groups. Patients in the HALS and LS groups recovered significantly faster than those from the OS group.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative study shows that HALS and LS can reproduce the equivalent short-term results of standard OS. HALS retained the minimal invasive advantages of LS, and significantly shorten the operation time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较直肠癌手辅助腹腔镜手术、腹腔镜手术及开放手术的短期疗效。

方法

纳入2009年6月至2012年6月间接受根治性切除术的390例直肠癌患者。患者分为手辅助组(HALS,n = 101)、腹腔镜手术组(LS,n = 157)和开放手术组(OS,n = 132)。比较三组患者的临床和疾病特征、手术参数、术后发病率、病理结果及恢复时间。

结果

HALS组平均手术时间为(173±39)分钟,LS组为(231±61)分钟,OS组为(173±39)分钟(P<0.01)。HALS组与LS组的中转率无差异(2.0%对3.2%,P = 0.708)。HALS组、LS组和OS组的总体并发症发生率分别为11.9%、11.5%和19.7%(P = 0.100)。三组间标本长度、远端切缘、获取淋巴结数及阳性淋巴结数等标本质量无差异。HALS组和LS组患者恢复明显快于OS组。

结论

本对比研究表明,HALS和LS可取得与标准OS相当的短期疗效。HALS保留了LS的微创优势,并显著缩短了手术时间。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer].[手辅助腹腔镜手术、腹腔镜手术及开放手术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;17(6):574-7.
2
[Short-term outcomes of radical resection of rectal carcinoma: hand-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopic approach].[直肠癌根治性切除的短期疗效:手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术方法对比]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 May;15(5):517-9.
3
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术比开放手术获得更高的淋巴结检出数和更好的短期疗效:一项大型单中心对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594.
4
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗后中低位直肠癌的开腹与腹腔镜手术比较(COREAN 试验):一项开放标签随机对照试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jul;11(7):637-45. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
5
S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.S052:机器人辅助手术、腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗直肠癌的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):240-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1166-z. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
6
[Comparison of short-term postoperative outcomes between hand-assisted laparoscopic and conventional sigmoidectomy].[手辅助腹腔镜与传统乙状结肠切除术术后短期结局的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;14(6):462-4.
7
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes.手助腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤手术:可行性、近期疗效及肿瘤学结局。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.019.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched study with long-term follow-up.手辅助腹腔镜手术与开放切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较:一项长期随访的病例匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;13:199. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0616-4.
9
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
10
The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.机器人手术治疗中低位直肠癌的影响:三臂对比——开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术的病例匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):95-101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686bbd.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.中国结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术:概述
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Dec 15;7(12):4635-45. eCollection 2014.