• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手助腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤手术:可行性、近期疗效及肿瘤学结局。

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.019
PMID:20633732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is an established alternative to laparoscopic-assisted surgery, but limited data exist regarding its applicability for colorectal cancer (CRC). We report short-term outcomes in a large series of CRC patients who underwent HALS between 2004 and 2009.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was used to identify all CRC patients. Patients with colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) were considered separately. Three patients with synchronous CC and RC were excluded. Data are frequency (%) or median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2009, 323 CRC patients underwent a HALS procedure. Median age was 65 (53-73) years, 39% were women, and the median BMI was 27 (24-31) kg/m(2). Diagnoses included 194 colon cancers (CC, 56.7% stage I/II), 129 rectal cancers (RC, 62.7% stage I/II). Operative time was less for CC than RC (157 vs 204 min; P < .0001). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in similar proportions of CC and RC cases (14% vs 10%; P = .38); lymph nodes retrieval was also similar (18 vs 18; P = .45). Overall duration of stay was 5 (4-7) days. At 30 days, postoperative complications occurred in similar proportions of CC and RC patients (28% vs 30%; P = .72). There was 1 mortality (0.5%). For the subgroup with 3 year follow-up, (73 CC and 45 RC patients), the overall survival was 80% and 88% (CC and RC, respectively), and disease free survival 79% and 85%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Colon and rectal cancer can be resected safely using HALS techniques. Conversion rates are low, complication rates expected, durations of hospital stay shorter, and the number of lymph nodes retrieved is high.

摘要

背景

手助腹腔镜手术(HALS)是腹腔镜辅助手术的一种成熟替代方法,但关于其在结直肠癌(CRC)中的适用性的数据有限。我们报告了在 2004 年至 2009 年间接受 HALS 的大量 CRC 患者的短期结果。

方法

使用前瞻性维护的数据库来识别所有 CRC 患者。结肠癌(CC)和直肠癌(RC)患者分别考虑。排除了 3 例同时患有 CC 和 RC 的患者。数据为频率(%)或中位数(四分位距)。

结果

2004 年至 2009 年间,323 例 CRC 患者接受了 HALS 手术。中位年龄为 65(53-73)岁,39%为女性,BMI 中位数为 27(24-31)kg/m2。诊断包括 194 例结肠癌(CC,56.7%为 I/II 期)和 129 例直肠癌(RC,62.7%为 I/II 期)。CC 的手术时间短于 RC(157 分钟对 204 分钟;P<.0001)。CC 和 RC 病例中转开腹的比例相似(14%对 10%;P=.38);淋巴结检出也相似(18 对 18;P=.45)。总住院时间为 5(4-7)天。在 30 天时,CC 和 RC 患者的术后并发症发生率相似(28%对 30%;P=.72)。有 1 例死亡(0.5%)。对于有 3 年随访的亚组(73 例 CC 和 45 例 RC 患者),总体生存率分别为 80%和 88%(CC 和 RC),无病生存率分别为 79%和 85%。

结论

使用 HALS 技术可以安全切除结肠癌和直肠癌。转换率低,并发症发生率预期,住院时间短,淋巴结检出数量高。

相似文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes.手助腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤手术:可行性、近期疗效及肿瘤学结局。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.019.
2
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
3
Differences in multidisciplinary team assessment and treatment between patients with stage IV colon and rectal cancer.IV期结肠癌和直肠癌患者在多学科团队评估与治疗方面的差异。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;11(7):768-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01648.x. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
4
Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术在区域卫生服务中的短期疗效比较:一项多中心研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318239341f.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.腹腔镜结肠癌和直肠癌手术
Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:93-9.
6
Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.机器人辅助直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3168-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9544-z. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
7
Experience with hand assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon.手辅助腹腔镜结肠手术的经验
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):13-8.
8
[Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery--after ten years and 350 operations].[腹腔镜结肠和直肠手术——十年及350例手术后]
Harefuah. 2007 Mar;146(3):176-80, 247-8.
9
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
10
Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in obese patients.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术治疗肥胖患者。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):878-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02348.x. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer.一项关于腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗结直肠癌的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(17):e15347. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015347.
2
Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery in T4 rectal cancer: A case-control study.T4期直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术:一项病例对照研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2019 Jan-Mar;15(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_67_18.
3
Outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with right colon cancers: A case-control study.
老年右半结肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜手术及手辅助腹腔镜手术的疗效:一项病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011907.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗结直肠癌的术中及术后结果:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7794. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007794.
5
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center.结直肠癌患者手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)与传统开腹手术的比较:单中心最终结果
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jun;13(6):4953-4958. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6035. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Laparoscopy for Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜直肠癌手术
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Apr;30(2):104-111. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597316.
7
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Standard Laparoscopic Colectomy: Are Outcomes and Operative Time Different?手辅助腹腔镜与标准腹腔镜结肠切除术:手术结果和手术时间有差异吗?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov;20(11):1854-1860. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3206-z. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌的比较:单中心中期结果
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 May;3(3):533-538. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.508. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched study with long-term follow-up.手辅助腹腔镜手术与开放切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较:一项长期随访的病例匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;13:199. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0616-4.
10
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的比较:单机构中期结果
Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug;8(2):627-632. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2182. Epub 2014 May 27.