Suppr超能文献

Anatomical eponyms, part 1: to look on the bright side.

作者信息

Olry Regis

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Anat. 2014 Nov;27(8):1142-4. doi: 10.1002/ca.22426. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

Abstract

The use of eponyms in medical sciences generally, and in anatomy specifically, remains controversial. In principle, this discussion should have been concluded as far back as 1895 (publication of the first Nomina anatomica): all eponyms should have been removed from the anatomical vocabulary then. In practice, what was believed to be a mere formality proved much more difficult to apply. Most eponyms remain in current use; moreover, their number goes on increasing. Assuming that there's no smoke without fire, we wondered why it seems impossible to get rid of a specific kind of term. The aim of this article and its successor is to weigh up the pros and cons.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验