• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植后恶性肿瘤的发生率——环孢素A与他克莫司的比较

Incidence of malignant neoplasia after heart transplantation--a comparison between cyclosporine a and tacrolimus.

作者信息

Fuchs Uwe, Klein Sarah, Zittermann Armin, Ensminger Stephan M, Schulz Uwe, Gummert Jan F

机构信息

Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphaliay, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Transplant. 2014 Jun 23;19:300-4. doi: 10.12659/AOT.890199.

DOI:10.12659/AOT.890199
PMID:24953848
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing malignant neoplasms. Administration of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine A (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC) may contribute to this risk.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We compared tumor incidence in heart transplant recipients receiving either CSA (n=25) or TAC (n=120) as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Exclusion criteria were therapy with mammalian target of rapamycin-inhibitors, death within the first postoperative year, re-transplantation, and age less than 18 years.

RESULTS

The 2 study groups were comparable with respect to sex, primary and concomitant diagnoses, and mean follow-up (60.7 ± 19.3 months in the CSA group vs. 59.8 ± 18.1 months in the TAC group; P=0.81). The CSA group was, however, significantly older compared with the TAC group (58.8 ± 11.4 years vs. 49.1 ± 13.0 years, P=0.001), as was the donor age of the CSA group (43.2 ± 11.2 years vs. 37.0 ± 11.7 years, P=0.02). In the CSA group, 5 patients (20%) developed malignant neoplasms compared with 10 patients (8.3%) in the TAC group (P=0.14). Covariate-adjusted 5-year tumor-free survival was comparable between groups (relative risk for the CSA group =1.162 [95% CI: 0.378-3.572; P=0.794]). Moreover, covariate-adjusted 5-year overall survival did not differ between the 2 groups (relative risk for the CSA group =1.95 [95% CI: 0.53-7.19; P=0.36). The incidence of infection, acute rejection, graft vasculopathy, renal failure, and neurological complications was also comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that tumor incidence does not significantly differ in patients receiving CSA or TAC as maintenance therapy.

摘要

背景

心脏移植受者发生恶性肿瘤的风险增加。使用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂环孢素A(CSA)或他克莫司(TAC)可能会增加这种风险。

材料与方法

我们比较了接受CSA(n = 25)或TAC(n = 120)作为维持免疫抑制治疗的心脏移植受者的肿瘤发生率。排除标准包括使用雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂治疗、术后第一年内死亡、再次移植以及年龄小于18岁。

结果

两个研究组在性别、原发性和伴随诊断以及平均随访时间方面具有可比性(CSA组为60.7±19.3个月,TAC组为59.8±18.1个月;P = 0.81)。然而,CSA组的年龄明显大于TAC组(58.8±11.4岁对49.1±13.0岁,P = 0.001),CSA组的供体年龄也是如此(43.2±11.2岁对37.0±11.7岁,P = 0.02)。CSA组有5例患者(20%)发生恶性肿瘤,而TAC组有10例患者(8.3%)发生恶性肿瘤(P = 0.14)。两组之间经协变量调整的5年无瘤生存率相当(CSA组的相对风险=1.162 [95% CI:0.378 - 3.572;P = 0.794])。此外,两组之间经协变量调整的5年总生存率没有差异(CSA组的相对风险=1.95 [95% CI:0.53 - 7.19;P = 0.36])。两组之间感染、急性排斥反应、移植血管病变、肾衰竭和神经并发症的发生率也相当。

结论

我们的数据表明,接受CSA或TAC作为维持治疗的患者的肿瘤发生率没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Incidence of malignant neoplasia after heart transplantation--a comparison between cyclosporine a and tacrolimus.心脏移植后恶性肿瘤的发生率——环孢素A与他克莫司的比较
Ann Transplant. 2014 Jun 23;19:300-4. doi: 10.12659/AOT.890199.
2
Clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus in combination with dosage reduction of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine A or tacrolimus.接受依维莫司联合钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂环孢素A或他克莫司减量治疗的心脏移植受者的临床结局
Transpl Immunol. 2014 Aug;31(2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Optimizing tacrolimus therapy in the maintenance of renal allografts: 12-month results.优化他克莫司治疗以维持肾移植:12个月的结果。
Transplantation. 2008 Jul 15;86(1):88-95. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817442cf.
4
Calcineurin Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity Through the Lens of Longitudinal Histology: Comparison of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus Eras.从纵向组织学角度看钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂肾毒性:环孢素时代与他克莫司时代的比较
Transplantation. 2016 Aug;100(8):1723-31. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001243.
5
Primary immunosuppression and outcome differences after heart transplantation: tacrolimus versus cyclosporine.心脏移植术后的初始免疫抑制及结局差异:他克莫司与环孢素的比较
Transplant Proc. 2011 Jul-Aug;43(6):2244-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.06.054.
6
Comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A in CYP3A5 expressing Chinese de novo kidney transplant recipients: a 2-year prospective study.他克莫司与环孢素A在表达CYP3A5的中国初发肾移植受者中的比较:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2015 May(183):43-52. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12666.
7
Impact of type of calcineurin inhibitor on post-transplant tuberculosis: Single-center study from India.钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂类型对移植后结核病的影响:来自印度的单中心研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;19(1). doi: 10.1111/tid.12626. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
8
Calcineurin inhibitors and Clostridium difficile infection in adult lung transplant recipients: the effect of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus.钙调磷酸酶抑制剂与成年肺移植受者艰难梭菌感染:环孢素与他克莫司的影响。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.041. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.肾移植中他克莫司与环孢素A微乳剂相比的疗效和安全性:2年随访结果
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 May;20(5):968-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh739. Epub 2005 Mar 1.
10
Randomized controlled study comparing reduced calcineurin inhibitors exposure versus standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.比较减少钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂暴露与基于环孢素的标准免疫抑制的随机对照研究。
Transplantation. 2007 Sep 27;84(6):706-14. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000282872.17024.b7.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin cancer after heart transplantation: a systematic review.心脏移植术后的皮肤癌:一项系统综述。
An Bras Dermatol. 2025 Jan-Feb;100(1):63-86. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Solid-Organ-Transplant-Associated Immunosuppression.实体器官移植相关免疫抑制患者的皮肤鳞状细胞癌
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;16(17):3083. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173083.
3
De novo papillary carcinoma in a renal allograft: the pros and cons of immunosuppression.肾移植受者新发乳头状癌:免疫抑制的利弊
CEN Case Rep. 2016 May;5(1):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s13730-015-0202-1. Epub 2015 Nov 2.