Suppr超能文献

随时间变化:开展儿童认知发展的纵向研究。

Change over Time: Conducting Longitudinal Studies of Children's Cognitive Development.

作者信息

Grammer Jennie K, Coffman Jennifer L, Ornstein Peter A, Morrison Frederick J

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Cogn Dev. 2013 Oct 1;14(4):515-528. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.833925.

Abstract

Developmental scientists have argued that the implementation of longitudinal methods is necessary for obtaining an accurate picture of the nature and sources of developmental change (Magnusson & Cairns, 1996; Morrison & Ornstein, 1996; Magnusson & Stattin, 2006). Developmentalists studying cognition have been relatively slow to embrace longitudinal research, and thus few exemplar studies have tracked individual children's cognitive performance over time and even fewer have examined contexts that are associated with this growth. In this article we first outline some of the benefits of implementing longitudinal designs. Using illustrations from existing studies of children's basic cognitive development and of their school-based academic performance, we discuss when it may be appropriate to employ longitudinal (versus other) methods. We then outline methods for integrating longitudinal data into one's research portfolio, contrasting the leveraging of existing longitudinal data sets with the launching of new longitudinal studies in order to address specific questions concerning cognitive development. Finally, for those who are interested in conducting longitudinal investigations of their own, we provide practical on-the-ground guidelines for designing and carrying out such studies of cognitive development.

摘要

发展科学家认为,采用纵向研究方法对于准确了解发展变化的本质和根源是必要的(马格努森和凯恩斯,1996年;莫里森和奥恩斯坦,1996年;马格努森和斯塔廷,2006年)。研究认知的发展学家相对较晚才接受纵向研究,因此很少有典范性研究长期跟踪个体儿童的认知表现,更少有人研究与这种发展相关的背景。在本文中,我们首先概述采用纵向设计的一些益处。通过引用现有关于儿童基本认知发展及其学业成绩的研究实例,我们讨论何时采用纵向(相对于其他)方法可能是合适的。然后,我们概述将纵向数据整合到个人研究项目中的方法,对比利用现有纵向数据集与开展新的纵向研究,以解决有关认知发展的具体问题。最后,对于那些有兴趣自行开展纵向调查的人,我们提供了设计和开展此类认知发展研究的实际操作指南。

相似文献

2
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
10
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.

引用本文的文献

9
Screening of Developmental Difficulties during the Transition to Primary School.小学过渡阶段发展困难的筛查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083958.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验