Grammer Jennie K, Coffman Jennifer L, Ornstein Peter A, Morrison Frederick J
Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Cogn Dev. 2013 Oct 1;14(4):515-528. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.833925.
Developmental scientists have argued that the implementation of longitudinal methods is necessary for obtaining an accurate picture of the nature and sources of developmental change (Magnusson & Cairns, 1996; Morrison & Ornstein, 1996; Magnusson & Stattin, 2006). Developmentalists studying cognition have been relatively slow to embrace longitudinal research, and thus few exemplar studies have tracked individual children's cognitive performance over time and even fewer have examined contexts that are associated with this growth. In this article we first outline some of the benefits of implementing longitudinal designs. Using illustrations from existing studies of children's basic cognitive development and of their school-based academic performance, we discuss when it may be appropriate to employ longitudinal (versus other) methods. We then outline methods for integrating longitudinal data into one's research portfolio, contrasting the leveraging of existing longitudinal data sets with the launching of new longitudinal studies in order to address specific questions concerning cognitive development. Finally, for those who are interested in conducting longitudinal investigations of their own, we provide practical on-the-ground guidelines for designing and carrying out such studies of cognitive development.
发展科学家认为,采用纵向研究方法对于准确了解发展变化的本质和根源是必要的(马格努森和凯恩斯,1996年;莫里森和奥恩斯坦,1996年;马格努森和斯塔廷,2006年)。研究认知的发展学家相对较晚才接受纵向研究,因此很少有典范性研究长期跟踪个体儿童的认知表现,更少有人研究与这种发展相关的背景。在本文中,我们首先概述采用纵向设计的一些益处。通过引用现有关于儿童基本认知发展及其学业成绩的研究实例,我们讨论何时采用纵向(相对于其他)方法可能是合适的。然后,我们概述将纵向数据整合到个人研究项目中的方法,对比利用现有纵向数据集与开展新的纵向研究,以解决有关认知发展的具体问题。最后,对于那些有兴趣自行开展纵向调查的人,我们提供了设计和开展此类认知发展研究的实际操作指南。