Kavanaugh Brian, Holler Karen
a Department of Clinical Psychology , Antioch University New England , Keene , New Hampshire, USA.
b Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior , Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Child Neuropsychol. 2015;21(6):840-8. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2014.929101. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
Children and adolescents with a history of childhood maltreatment are at risk for a host of psychiatric conditions, although the underlying neurocognitive functioning of these individuals remains largely understudied. This study examined the neurocognitive functioning of childhood maltreatment victims in an adolescent psychiatric inpatient setting. The sample consisted of adolescent inpatients (ages 13-19) that completed intellectual testing as part of a neuropsychological/psychological assessment during hospitalization (n = 39). The sample was grouped based on childhood maltreatment history with one group categorized by maltreatment history (n = 15) and the other group characterized by no maltreatment history (n = 24). Analyses revealed statistically significant differences (p < .01) between maltreatment groups on the majority of assessed domains. When controlling for intelligence, only performance differences on the RCFT remained. RCFT differences remained after controlling for the influence of visual-motor and visual-perceptual/visual-spatial functioning, highlighting the influence of organizational and planning difficulties in those individuals with maltreatment history. Group differences in the frequency of impaired performance for neuropsychological tasks were largest (p < .001) for FSIQ and RCFT. Compromised neurocognitive functioning may negatively contribute to the clinical presentation of this population, highlighting the importance of the child neuropsychologist in the effective treatment of children and adolescents with a history of childhood maltreatment.
有童年期虐待史的儿童和青少年面临一系列精神疾病的风险,尽管这些个体潜在的神经认知功能在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。本研究在青少年精神科住院环境中考察了童年期虐待受害者的神经认知功能。样本包括青少年住院患者(年龄13 - 19岁),他们在住院期间完成了作为神经心理学/心理学评估一部分的智力测试(n = 39)。样本根据童年期虐待史进行分组,一组有虐待史(n = 15),另一组无虐待史(n = 24)。分析显示,在大多数评估领域,虐待组之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p < .01)。在控制智力因素后,仅在雷氏复杂图形测验(RCFT)上存在表现差异。在控制视觉 - 运动和视觉感知/视觉空间功能的影响后,RCFT差异仍然存在,这突出了组织和计划困难对有虐待史个体的影响。在全量表智商(FSIQ)和RCFT方面,神经心理学任务表现受损频率的组间差异最大(p < .001)。受损的神经认知功能可能对该人群的临床表现产生负面影响,这凸显了儿童神经心理学家在有效治疗有童年期虐待史的儿童和青少年方面的重要性。