García-Pérez Miguel A
Departamento de Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Spain.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 10;8:415. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00415. eCollection 2014.
Time perception is studied with subjective or semi-objective psychophysical methods. With subjective methods, observers provide quantitative estimates of duration and data depict the psychophysical function relating subjective duration to objective duration. With semi-objective methods, observers provide categorical or comparative judgments of duration and data depict the psychometric function relating the probability of a certain judgment to objective duration. Both approaches are used to study whether subjective and objective time run at the same pace or whether time flies or slows down under certain conditions. We analyze theoretical aspects affecting the interpretation of data gathered with the most widely used semi-objective methods, including single-presentation and paired-comparison methods. For this purpose, a formal model of psychophysical performance is used in which subjective duration is represented via a psychophysical function and the scalar property. This provides the timing component of the model, which is invariant across methods. A decisional component that varies across methods reflects how observers use subjective durations to make judgments and give the responses requested under each method. Application of the model shows that psychometric functions in single-presentation methods are uninterpretable because the various influences on observed performance are inextricably confounded in the data. In contrast, data gathered with paired-comparison methods permit separating out those influences. Prevalent approaches to fitting psychometric functions to data are also discussed and shown to be inconsistent with widely accepted principles of time perception, implicitly assuming instead that subjective time equals objective time and that observed differences across conditions do not reflect differences in perceived duration but criterion shifts. These analyses prompt evidence-based recommendations for best methodological practice in studies on time perception.
时间知觉是通过主观或半客观的心理物理学方法来研究的。使用主观方法时,观察者对时长提供定量估计,数据描绘了将主观时长与客观时长联系起来的心理物理学函数。使用半客观方法时,观察者对时长提供分类或比较判断,数据描绘了将某种判断的概率与客观时长联系起来的心理测量函数。这两种方法都用于研究主观时间和客观时间是否以相同的速度流逝,或者在某些条件下时间是否飞逝或变慢。我们分析了影响对使用最广泛的半客观方法(包括单呈现和配对比较方法)收集的数据进行解释的理论方面。为此,使用了一种心理物理学表现的形式模型,其中主观时长通过心理物理学函数和标量属性来表示。这提供了模型的计时成分,它在不同方法中是不变的。跨方法变化的决策成分反映了观察者如何使用主观时长来做出判断并给出每种方法所要求的反应。该模型的应用表明,单呈现方法中的心理测量函数无法解释,因为对观察到的表现的各种影响在数据中是无法分割地混淆在一起的。相比之下,用配对比较方法收集的数据允许分离出这些影响。还讨论了将心理测量函数拟合到数据的普遍方法,并表明这些方法与广泛接受的时间知觉原则不一致,相反,它们隐含地假设主观时间等于客观时间,并且不同条件下观察到的差异不反映感知时长的差异,而是标准的变化。这些分析为时间知觉研究中的最佳方法实践提出了基于证据的建议。