Burke Rachel M, Smith Emily R, Dahl Rebecca Moritz, Rebolledo Paulina A, Calderón Maria del Carmen, Cañipa Beatriz, Chavez Edgar, Pinto Rolando, Tamayo Luis, Terán Carlos, Veizaga Angel, Zumaran Remy, Iñiguez Volga, Leon Juan S
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 24;14:642. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-642.
Worldwide, acute gastroenteritis causes substantial morbidity and mortality in children less than five years of age. In Bolivia, which has one of the lower GDPs in South America, 16% of child deaths can be attributed to diarrhea, and the costs associated with diarrhea can weigh heavily on patient families. To address this need, the study goal was to identify predictors of cost burden (diarrhea-related costs incurred as a percentage of annual income) and catastrophic cost (cost burden ≥ 1% of annual household income).
From 2007 to 2009, researchers interviewed caregivers (n = 1,107) of pediatric patients (<5 years old) seeking treatment for diarrhea in six Bolivian hospitals. Caregivers were surveyed on demographics, clinical symptoms, direct (e.g. medication, consult fees), and indirect (e.g. lost wages) costs. Multivariate regression models (n = 551) were used to assess relationships of covariates to the outcomes of cost burden (linear model) and catastrophic cost (logistic model).
We determined that cost burden and catastrophic cost shared the same significant (p < 0.05) predictors. In the logistic model that also controlled for child sex, child age, household size, rural residence, transportations taken to the current visit, whether the child presented with complications, and whether this was the child's first episode of diarrhea, significant predictors of catastrophic cost included outpatient status (OR 0.16, 95% CI [0.07, 0.37]); seeking care at a private hospital (OR 4.12, 95% CI [2.30, 7.41]); having previously sought treatment for this diarrheal episode (OR 3.92, 95% CI [1.64, 9.35]); and the number of days the child had diarrhea prior to the current visit (OR 1.14, 95% CI [1.05, 1.24]).
Our analysis highlights the economic impact of pediatric diarrhea from the familial perspective and provides insight into potential areas of intervention to reduce associated economic burden.
在全球范围内,急性肠胃炎导致五岁以下儿童出现大量发病和死亡情况。在南美洲国内生产总值较低的玻利维亚,16%的儿童死亡可归因于腹泻,腹泻相关的费用会给患者家庭带来沉重负担。为满足这一需求,本研究的目标是确定成本负担(腹泻相关费用占年收入的百分比)和灾难性成本(成本负担≥家庭年收入的1%)的预测因素。
2007年至2009年期间,研究人员采访了在玻利维亚六家医院因腹泻接受治疗的儿科患者(<5岁)的看护人(n = 1107)。对看护人进行了人口统计学、临床症状、直接费用(如药物、诊疗费)和间接费用(如工资损失)方面的调查。使用多变量回归模型(n = 551)评估协变量与成本负担结果(线性模型)和灾难性成本结果(逻辑模型)之间的关系。
我们确定成本负担和灾难性成本具有相同的显著(p < 0.05)预测因素。在同时控制了儿童性别、儿童年龄、家庭规模、农村居住情况、本次就诊所乘坐的交通工具、儿童是否出现并发症以及这是否是儿童首次腹泻发作的逻辑模型中,灾难性成本的显著预测因素包括门诊状态(比值比0.16,95%置信区间[0.07, 0.37]);在私立医院就诊(比值比4.12,95%置信区间[2.30, 7.41]);此前曾就此次腹泻发作寻求治疗(比值比3.92,95%置信区间[1.64, 9.35]);以及儿童在本次就诊前腹泻的天数(比值比1.14,95%置信区间[1.05, 1.24])。
我们的分析从家庭角度突出了儿科腹泻的经济影响,并为减少相关经济负担的潜在干预领域提供了见解。