Department of Psychiatry, Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Harvard Medical School, Somerville, MA 02143, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 2):1232-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01387.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
To review methods of measuring racial/ethnic health care disparities.
Identification and tracking of racial/ethnic disparities in health care will be advanced by application of a consistent definition and reliable empirical methods. We have proposed a definition of racial/ethnic health care disparities based in the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Unequal Treatment report, which defines disparities as all differences except those due to clinical need and preferences. After briefly summarizing the strengths and critiques of this definition, we review methods that have been used to implement it. We discuss practical issues that arise during implementation and expand these methods to identify sources of disparities. We also situate the focus on methods to measure racial/ethnic health care disparities (an endeavor predominant in the United States) within a larger international literature in health outcomes and health care inequality. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We compare different methods of implementing the IOM definition on measurement of disparities in any use of mental health care and mental health care expenditures using the 2004-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Disparities analysts should be aware of multiple methods available to measure disparities and their differing assumptions. We prefer a method concordant with the IOM definition.
回顾测量种族/民族医疗保健差异的方法。
通过应用一致的定义和可靠的经验方法,将推进医疗保健中种族/民族差异的识别和跟踪。我们根据医学研究所(IOM)的不平等治疗报告提出了一个基于种族/民族医疗保健差异的定义,该定义将差异定义为除临床需求和偏好以外的所有差异。在简要总结该定义的优点和批评后,我们回顾了已用于实施该定义的方法。我们讨论了在实施过程中出现的实际问题,并扩展了这些方法以确定差异的来源。我们还将关注测量种族/民族医疗保健差异的方法(这在美国占据主导地位)置于健康结果和医疗保健不平等的更广泛国际文献中。实证应用:我们使用 2004-2008 年医疗支出调查比较了在任何心理健康护理使用和心理健康护理支出方面实施 IOM 定义的不同方法。
差异分析师应该意识到有多种方法可用于衡量差异及其不同的假设。我们更喜欢与 IOM 定义一致的方法。