PhD National Programme in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
School of Medicine, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;31(11):7023-7039. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110517.
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.
A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).
Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.
本研究旨在评估残疾对 CRC 筛查参与的影响,并确定总体效应大小。
我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较有和无残疾者的 CRC 筛查参与情况。搜索涵盖了五个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Google Scholar、medRxiv)。为了综合研究结果,我们针对每种 CRC 筛查类型和残疾类别计算了汇总估计值。使用随机效应模型得出 CRC 筛查的参与情况。
共纳入 20 篇文章,其中大多数来自美国。根据汇总估计值,与无残疾者相比,残疾者进行 CRC 筛查的可能性较低(OR = 0.80,95%CI 0.73-0.87)。按筛查类型分析表明,残疾者进行粪便潜血试验或粪便免疫化学试验的可能性较低(OR:0.72,95%CI 0.65-0.81),结肠镜检查则无显著差异。智力残疾者的 CRC 筛查参与率明显较低(OR = 0.65,95%CI 0.53-0.79),尤其是粪便潜血试验/FIT(OR = 0.58,95%CI 0.49-0.69)。
残疾者的 CRC 筛查参与存在差异。需要进一步研究和协调努力,为这个不可忽视的患者群体制定改善早期癌症诊断的干预措施。