• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直径-轴向-极向肾测量法与RENAL肾测量评分在小肾肿块患者治疗决策中的比较

Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score for treatment decision-making in patients with small renal mass.

作者信息

Naya Yoshio, Kawauchi Akihiro, Oishi Masakatu, Ueda Takashi, Fujihara Atsuko, Naito Yasuyuki, Nakamura Terukazu, Hongo Fumiya, Kamoi Kazumi, Okihara Koji, Miki Tsuneharu

机构信息

The Department of Urology, Graduation School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan,

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;20(2):358-61. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0714-2. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-014-0714-2
PMID:24964973
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate our institution's experience in performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with small renal masses.

METHODS

142 patients with cT1aN0M0 lesions were identified. 68 of these subjects were treated with LRN and 74 were treated with laparoscopic PN (LPN). The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups of patients, including diameter-axial-polar (DAP) nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score (RENAL-NS), operative results, and outcomes, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A multivariate logistic regression analysis for the selection of PN as the treatment showed that tumor size, DAP nephrometry, RENAL-NS and imperative condition were all independent factors. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristics (ROC-AUC) of DAP and RENAL-NS for performing LPN were 0.897 and 0.825, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LRN was performed in patients with a high nephrometry score in this study, open partial nephrectomy (OPN) should be considered for patients with a high nephrometry score in T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) because of better functional and similar oncological outcomes. Based on ROC analysis, when DAP is 6 or less, LPN should be considered and when DAP is 7 or more, OPN should be considered.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估我们机构在为小肾肿块患者实施腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)和部分肾切除术(PN)方面的经验。

方法

确定了142例cT1aN0M0病变患者。其中68例接受了LRN治疗,74例接受了腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)。对两组患者的临床病理特征,包括直径-轴-极(DAP)肾测量法和RENAL肾测量评分(RENAL-NS)、手术结果及预后进行了回顾性分析。

结果

对选择PN作为治疗方法的多因素逻辑回归分析显示,肿瘤大小、DAP肾测量法、RENAL-NS和必要条件均为独立因素。用于实施LPN的DAP和RENAL-NS的曲线下面积受试者操作特征(ROC-AUC)分别为0.897和0.825。

结论

尽管本研究中对肾测量评分高的患者实施了LRN,但由于功能结局更好且肿瘤学结局相似,对于T1a期肾细胞癌(RCC)肾测量评分高的患者应考虑开放性部分肾切除术(OPN)。基于ROC分析,当DAP为6或以下时,应考虑LPN;当DAP为7或以上时,应考虑OPN。

相似文献

1
Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score for treatment decision-making in patients with small renal mass.直径-轴向-极向肾测量法与RENAL肾测量评分在小肾肿块患者治疗决策中的比较
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;20(2):358-61. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0714-2. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
2
[THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE DECISION TO PERFORM LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL TUMOR].[影响对小肾肿瘤实施腹腔镜部分肾切除术决策的因素]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2016;107(2):73-78. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.107.73.
3
Usefulness of the diameter-axial-polar nephrometry score for predicting perioperative parameters in robotic partial nephrectomy.直径-轴向-极向肾计量评分在预测机器人辅助肾部分切除术中围手术期参数方面的效用。
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):841-5. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1372-8. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
4
Diameter-Axial-Polar Nephrometry is Predictive of Surgical Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy.直径-轴向-极坐标肾测量法可预测部分肾切除术后的手术结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1228. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001228.
5
Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.肾计量评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜与开放性肾部分切除术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):679-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0801-x. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与腹腔镜或开放性部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌:在采用初期老年患者并发症发生率的比较。
Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.050.
7
RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak.肾肿瘤影像学评分与部分肾切除术的手术入路和尿漏有关。
Urology. 2012 Jul;80(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.026.
8
Preoperative predictors of surgical approach for partial nephrectomy.部分肾切除术手术入路的术前预测指标
Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5896-902.
9
R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort.RENAL 评分在选定队列中对保肾手术结果预测的表现优于 PADUA 评分、C 指数和 DAP 评分。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.176. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Preserving Renal Function through Partial Nephrectomy Depends on Tumor Complexity in T1b Renal Tumors.通过部分肾切除术保留肾功能取决于T1b期肾肿瘤的肿瘤复杂性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Mar;32(3):495-501. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.3.495.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiating the clinical and computed tomography imaging features of mixed epithelial and stromal tumors of the kidney to establish a treatment plan.区分肾脏混合性上皮和间质肿瘤的临床和计算机断层成像特征,以制定治疗计划。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jan;23(1):e13486. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13486. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
2
Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications.小(≤4厘米)肾肿块的图像引导活检:大小和解剖位置对活检成功率及并发症的影响
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170666. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170666. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Predicting outcomes in partial nephrectomy: is the renal score useful?

本文引用的文献

1
Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems.径轴向极肾单位切除术:R.E.N.A.L. 和中心性指数评分系统的整合和优化。
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.123. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
2
Tumour size, tumour complexity, and surgical approach are associated with nephrectomy type in small renal cortical tumours treated electively.肿瘤大小、肿瘤复杂性和手术途径与选择性治疗的小肾皮质肿瘤的肾切除术类型相关。
BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(11):1607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10607.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
3
Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.
预测部分肾切除术的预后:肾脏评分有用吗?
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 May-Jun;43(3):422-431. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0315.
4
The renal tumor morphological characteristics that affect surgical planning for laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy.影响腹腔镜或开放性部分肾切除术手术规划的肾肿瘤形态学特征。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2015 Feb;77(1-2):229-35.
慢性肾脏病治疗的循证实践指南
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009 Dec;13(6):537-66. doi: 10.1007/s10157-009-0237-8.
4
A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.对肾癌微创手术和主动监测实际作用的批判性分析。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
5
The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分:一种用于量化肾肿瘤大小、位置和深度的综合标准化系统。
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):844-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
6
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
7
Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality.根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术:对总死亡率和非癌症死亡率的影响。
Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1465-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24035.
8
Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?小肾肿瘤患者行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术——死亡率和心血管结局是否存在差异?
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):55-61; discussion 61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.017. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
9
Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.微创保留肾单位手术
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Sep;18(5):462-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32830a4f10.
10
Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review.切除、消融还是观察:小肾肿物的困境——一项荟萃分析与综述
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1227-33; discussion 1233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.047. Epub 2008 Feb 20.