• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国 FDA 在六年期间发给赞助商、机构审查委员会和研究者的警告信进行审核。

An audit of US FDA warning letters issued to sponsors, institutional review boards and investigators over a six-year period.

机构信息

Senior Resident Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.

Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, INDIA.

出版信息

Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Apr-Jun;VII(2):108-113. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2021.094.

DOI:10.20529/IJME.2021.094
PMID:35765256
Abstract

The present audit was carried out with the objective of evaluating warning letters (WLs) issued to trial sponsors, clinical investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) by the United States Food and Drug Administration during a six-year period and compare it with two similar earlier audits. WLs were reviewed and classified as per stakeholders and further categorised as per predefined violation themes. The chi-square test was performed for trend analysis of WLs. A total of 62 WLs were issued to the three stakeholders. The maximum number of WLs were issued to the clinical investigators (36/62, 58.06%), followed by sponsors (19/62, 30.64%), and least to the IRBs (7/62, 11.29%). Among sponsors, lack of standard operating procedures for the monitoring, receipt, evaluation and reporting of post-marketing adverse drug events was the most common violation theme (8/19, 42.1%). Among clinical investigators, deviation from investigational plan was the most common violation theme (31/36, 86.11%.). For IRBs, inadequate documentation was the most common violation theme (6/7, 85.71%). We saw an overall reduction in the number of WLs issued to the stakeholders. Thus, we identified multiple areas on which each stakeholder should work for improvement.

摘要

本次审核旨在评估美国食品和药物管理局在六年期间向试验赞助商、临床研究者和机构审查委员会 (IRB) 发布的警告信 (WL),并将其与之前的两次类似审核进行比较。对 WL 进行了审查和分类,根据利益相关者进行分类,并根据预先定义的违规主题进一步进行分类。采用卡方检验对 WL 进行趋势分析。共向三个利益相关者发布了 62 份 WL。向临床研究者发布的 WL 数量最多 (36/62,58.06%),其次是赞助商 (19/62,30.64%),IRB 最少 (7/62,11.29%)。在赞助商中,最常见的违规主题是缺乏监测、接收、评估和报告上市后药物不良反应的标准操作程序 (8/19,42.1%)。在临床研究者中,最常见的违规主题是偏离研究计划 (31/36,86.11%)。对于 IRB,最常见的违规主题是文件不足 (6/7,85.71%)。我们看到向利益相关者发布的 WL 数量总体减少。因此,我们确定了每个利益相关者应该改进的多个领域。

相似文献

1
An audit of US FDA warning letters issued to sponsors, institutional review boards and investigators over a six-year period.对美国 FDA 在六年期间发给赞助商、机构审查委员会和研究者的警告信进行审核。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Apr-Jun;VII(2):108-113. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2021.094.
2
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators and institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员和机构审查委员会的警告信研究。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2011 Oct-Dec;8(4):211-4. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2011.082.
3
Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.美国食品药品监督管理局向临床研究人员、机构审查委员会和申办者发出的警告信分析:一项回顾性研究
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
5
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员的警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):129-34.
6
Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Warning letters to sponsor-investigators at academic health centres - the regulatory "canaries in a coal mine".致学术健康中心申办方研究者的警告信——监管领域的“煤矿中的金丝雀”
Clin Invest Med. 2013 Dec 1;36(6):E290-6. doi: 10.25011/cim.v36i6.20626.
8
An Updated Review of Food and Drug Administration Warning and Untitled Letters for Clinical Outcome Assessment Claims Between 2013 and 2021.2013 年至 2021 年期间食品和药物管理局关于临床结果评估声明的警告和未命名信的更新审查。
Value Health. 2023 Dec;26(12):1675-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
9
Content Analysis of 2012-2019 FDA Warning Letters and Notices of Violations using the Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) Model.使用经济、临床和人文结果(ECHO)模型对2012 - 2019年美国食品药品监督管理局警告信和违规通知进行内容分析。
Innov Pharm. 2021 Jan 13;12(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3420. eCollection 2021.
10
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Research Misconduct Using FDA-Issued Warning Letters and Clinical Investigator Inspection List From 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年期间,使用 FDA 发布的警告信和临床研究者检查清单对临床研究不当行为进行回顾性分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):976-982. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002694.