Kyriakopoulos Marinos, Stringaris Argyris, Manolesou Sofia, Radobuljac Maja Drobnič, Jacobs Brian, Reichenberg Avi, Stahl Daniel, Simonoff Emily, Frangou Sophia
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Clinical Academic Group, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK,
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;24(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0576-1. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
In children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), high rates of idiosyncratic fears and anxiety reactions and thought disorder are thought to increase the risk of psychosis. The critical next step is to identify whether combinations of these symptoms can be used to categorise individual patients into ASD subclasses, and to test their relevance to psychosis. All patients with ASD (n = 84) admitted to a specialist national inpatient unit from 2003 to 2012 were rated for the presence or absence of impairment in affective regulation and anxiety (peculiar phobias, panic episodes, explosive reactions to anxiety), social deficits (social disinterest, avoidance or withdrawal and abnormal attachment) and thought disorder (disorganised or illogical thinking, bizarre fantasies, overvalued or delusional ideas). Latent class analysis of individual symptoms was conducted to identify ASD classes. External validation of these classes was performed using as a criterion the presence of hallucinations. Latent class analysis identified two distinct classes. Bizarre fears and anxiety reactions and thought disorder symptoms differentiated ASD patients into those with psychotic features (ASD-P: 51 %) and those without (ASD-NonP: 49 %). Hallucinations were present in 26 % of the ASD-P class but only 2.4 % of the ASD-NonP. Both the ASD-P and the ASD-NonP class benefited from inpatient treatment although inpatient stay was prolonged in the ASD-P class. This study provides the first empirically derived classification of ASD in relation to psychosis based on three underlying symptom dimensions, anxiety, social deficits and thought disorder. These results can be further developed by testing the reproducibility and prognostic value of the identified classes.
在患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童中,特殊恐惧、焦虑反应和思维障碍的高发生率被认为会增加患精神病的风险。接下来的关键步骤是确定这些症状的组合是否可用于将个体患者分类为ASD亚类,并检验它们与精神病的相关性。2003年至2012年入住一家国家级专科住院部的所有ASD患者(n = 84),均就情感调节和焦虑(特殊恐惧症、惊恐发作、对焦虑的爆发性反应)、社交缺陷(社交冷漠、回避或退缩以及异常依恋)和思维障碍(思维紊乱或不合逻辑、奇异幻想、超价观念或妄想观念)的有无进行了评定。对个体症状进行潜在类别分析以确定ASD类别。以幻觉的存在作为标准对这些类别进行外部验证。潜在类别分析确定了两个不同的类别。奇异恐惧、焦虑反应和思维障碍症状将ASD患者分为有精神病特征者(ASD-P:51%)和无精神病特征者(ASD-NonP:49%)。ASD-P类别中有26%存在幻觉,而ASD-NonP类别中仅为2.4%。ASD-P和ASD-NonP类别患者均从住院治疗中获益,尽管ASD-P类别患者的住院时间延长。本研究基于焦虑、社交缺陷和思维障碍这三个潜在症状维度,首次提供了与精神病相关的ASD的实证分类。通过检验所确定类别的可重复性和预后价值,这些结果可得到进一步完善。