Suppr超能文献

儿童固体口服剂型的可及性:一项成本节约调查。

Solid oral forms availability in children: a cost saving investigation.

作者信息

Lajoinie Audrey, Henin Emilie, Kassai Behrouz, Terry David

机构信息

EPICIME-CIC 1407 Inserm, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon, F-69677, Bron, France; Université Lyon 1, UMR 5558 CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;78(5):1080-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12442.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the suitability and potential cost savings, from both the hospital and community perspective, of prescribed oral liquid medicine substitution with acceptable solid forms for children over 2 years.

METHOD

Oral liquid medicines dispensed from a paediatric hospital (UK) in 1 week were assessed by screening for existence of the solid form alternative and evaluating the acceptability of the available solid form, firstly related to the prescribed dose and secondly to acceptable size depending on the child's age. Costs were calculated based on providing treatment for 28 days or prescribed duration for short term treatments.

RESULTS

Over 90% (440/476) of liquid formulations were available as a marketed solid form. Considering dosage acceptability (maximum of 10% deviation from prescribed dosage or 0% for narrow therapeutic range drugs, maximum tablet divisions into quarters) 80% of liquids could be substituted with a solid form. The main limitation for liquid substitution would be solid form size. However, two-thirds of prescribed liquids could have been substituted with a suitable solid form for dosage and size, with estimated savings being of £5K and £8K in 1 week, respectively based on hospital and community costs, corresponding to a projected annual saving of £238K and £410K (single institution).

CONCLUSION

Whilst not all children over 2 years will be able to swallow tablets, drug cost savings if oral liquid formulations were substituted with suitable solid dosage forms would be considerable. Given the numerous advantages of solid forms compared with liquids, this study may provide a theoretical basis for investing in supporting children to swallow tablets/capsules.

摘要

目的

从医院和社区的角度评估用可接受的固体剂型替代2岁以上儿童口服液体药物的适用性和潜在成本节约情况。

方法

对一家儿科医院(英国)一周内发放的口服液体药物进行评估,首先筛查是否存在固体剂型替代物,然后评估现有固体剂型的可接受性,一方面与规定剂量相关,另一方面与根据儿童年龄确定的可接受尺寸相关。成本是根据提供28天治疗或短期治疗规定疗程来计算的。

结果

超过90%(440/476)的液体制剂有市售固体剂型。考虑剂量可接受性(与规定剂量的最大偏差为10%,窄治疗范围药物为0%,片剂最大可分成四分之一),80%的液体可用固体剂型替代。液体替代的主要限制因素将是固体剂型的尺寸。然而,三分之二的规定液体可以用适合剂量和尺寸的固体剂型替代,根据医院和社区成本估算,一周内分别可节省5000英镑和8000英镑,相当于预计每年节省23.8万英镑和41万英镑(单个机构)。

结论

虽然并非所有2岁以上儿童都能吞咽片剂,但如果用合适的固体剂型替代口服液体制剂,药物成本节约将相当可观。鉴于固体剂型相对于液体剂型有诸多优势,本研究可为投资支持儿童吞咽片剂/胶囊提供理论依据。

相似文献

5
Oral medicines for children in the European paediatric investigation plans.欧洲儿科研究计划中的儿童口服药物。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e98348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098348. eCollection 2014.
7
Evidence of acceptability of oral paediatric medicines: a review.口服儿科药物可接受性的证据:一项综述。
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;69(4):361-376. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12610. Epub 2016 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
More on influenza vaccine in young children.更多关于幼儿流感疫苗的信息。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2528; author reply 2528-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1205643.
5
Preparation of medicines for children - a hierarchy of classification.儿童用药制备——分类层次。
Int J Pharm. 2012 Oct 5;435(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.05.070. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
10
Medication errors in the homes of children with chronic conditions.慢性病患儿家中的用药错误。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jun;96(6):581-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.204479. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验