Suppr超能文献

开胸术后镇痛质量的随机前瞻性研究:单次推注与弹性泵持续输注椎旁阻滞。

A randomized prospective study of analgesic quality after thoracotomy: paravertebral block with bolus versus continuous infusion with an elastomeric pump.

作者信息

Fibla Juan J, Molins Laureano, Mier José M, Hernandez Jorge, Sierra Ana

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari del Sagrat Cor (HUSC), Barcelona, Spain

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari del Sagrat Cor (HUSC), Barcelona, Spain Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clinic (HC), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Apr;47(4):631-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu246. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Paravertebral block (PVB) with infusion of local anaesthetic (LA) through a paravertebral catheter is an effective alternative to epidural analgesia in the management of post-thoracotomy pain. PVB can be done in two ways: either through administration of a bolus dose of the LA or continuous infusion via an infusion pump; currently, there is no consensus on which route is best. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of the PVB for post-thoracotomy pain control using bolus doses versus a continuous infusion pump.

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized study of 80 patients submitted to thoracotomy. Patients were divided into two independent groups (anterior thoracotomy--ANT--and posterolateral thoracotomy-POST). At the conclusion of the surgery, a catheter was inserted under direct vision in the thoracic paravertebral space at the level of the incision. In each group, patients were randomized to receive levobupivacaine 0.5% every 6 h ('Bolus' group) or levobupivacaine 0.25% in continuous infusion at 5 ml/h through an elastomeric pump ('Continuous infusion' group). Patients in both groups received the same dosage of LA: 300 mg/day. Metamizole (every 6 h) was administered as an adjunct. Subcutaneous meperidine was employed as a rescue medication. Pain scores were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirteen (16.2%) patients required meperidine for rescue (8 in continuous infusion and 5 in the bolus group). Mean VAS scores were the following: all the cases (n = 80): 5.0 ± 1.6, ANT (n = 36): 4.4 ± 1.8, POST (n = 44): 5.4 ± 1.6, Bolus (n = 40): 4.7 ± 1.7, Continuous infusion (n = 40): 5.2 ± 1.8, ANT with bolus (n = 18): 4.1 ± 1.7, ANT with continuous infusion (n = 18): 4.7 ± 1.8, POST with bolus (n = 22): 5.2 ± 1.5, POST with continuous infusion (n = 22): 5.6 ± 1.6.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-thoracotomy pain control using a combination of PVB and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug is a safe and effective approach. Patients submitted to ANT experienced less pain than those with POST 4.4 vs 5.4 (P = 0.02). Since no statistical differences were observed, it was not possible to confirm differences between the LA administered in a bolus versus continuous infusion.

摘要

目的

通过椎旁导管输注局部麻醉药(LA)的椎旁阻滞(PVB)是开胸术后疼痛管理中硬膜外镇痛的一种有效替代方法。PVB可通过两种方式进行:要么给予一次性大剂量LA,要么通过输液泵持续输注;目前,对于哪种途径最佳尚无共识。我们的目的是比较使用一次性大剂量给药与持续输注泵进行PVB控制开胸术后疼痛的疗效。

方法

我们对80例行开胸手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。患者分为两个独立组(前外侧开胸术——ANT组和后外侧开胸术——POST组)。手术结束时,在直视下于切口水平的胸段椎旁间隙插入一根导管。在每组中,患者被随机分为每6小时接受0.5%左旋布比卡因(“一次性大剂量”组)或通过弹性泵以5 ml/h的速度持续输注0.25%左旋布比卡因(“持续输注”组)。两组患者接受相同剂量的LA:300 mg/天。给予美他多辛(每6小时一次)作为辅助用药。皮下注射哌替啶用作补救药物。术后1、6、24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛评分。

结果

13例(16.2%)患者需要使用哌替啶进行补救(持续输注组8例,一次性大剂量组5例)。平均VAS评分如下:所有病例(n = 80):5.0±1.6,ANT组(n = 36):4.4±1.8,POST组(n = 44):5.4±1.6,一次性大剂量组(n = 40):4.7±1.7,持续输注组(n = 40):5.2±1.8,ANT组一次性大剂量给药(n = 18):仅4.1±1.7,ANT组持续输注(n = 18):4.7±1.8,POST组一次性大剂量给药(n = 22):5.2±1.5,POST组持续输注(n = 22):5.6±1.6。

结论

使用PVB与非甾体类抗炎药联合控制开胸术后疼痛是一种安全有效的方法。接受ANT手术的患者比接受POST手术的患者疼痛程度轻,分别为4.4和5.4(P = 0.02)。由于未观察到统计学差异,因此无法确认一次性大剂量给药与持续输注LA之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验