A randomized controlled trial comparing paravertebral block via the surgical field with thoracic epidural block using ropivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief.

PURPOSE

We conducted a comparative study to evaluate analgesic efficacy between paravertebral block via the surgical field (PVB-sf), in which the catheter was inserted into the ventral side of the sympathetic trunk in the paravertebral space by a thoracic surgeon under thoracoscopic visualization, and epidural block (Epi) using ropivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief.

METHODS

Lung cancer patients scheduled for lobectomy via thoracotomy were randomly allocated to receive either PVB-sf or Epi (n = 36 per group). Before thoracotomy closure, 0.375% ropivacaine was administered as a bolus (PVB-sf, 20 mL; Epi, 5 mL), followed by a 300-mL continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) score at various time points, including the primary endpoint of 2 h after ropivacaine bolus injection. Sensory block area, vital signs, serum ropivacaine concentrations, and side effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The Epi group showed significantly lower VAS scores and blood pressure and a wider sensory block area than the PVB-sf group at all evaluation time points. While the mean serum ropivacaine concentration in the PVB-sf group was significantly higher than that in the Epi group until 1 h after injection of the ropivacaine bolus, there was no significant difference at any subsequent assessment point. The incidence of side effects was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The Epi was superior to PVB-sf for the management of post-thoracotomy pain in this patient cohort. The number of dermatomes anaesthetized by Epi was greater than that anaesthetized by PVB-sf. No difference in complication rates was observed between the two groups.