Suppr超能文献

不同粘结策略对I类复合树脂修复体术后敏感性的影响。

Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.

作者信息

Sancakli Hande Sar, Yildiz Esra, Bayrak Isil, Ozel Sevda

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkiye.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):15-22. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126234.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the post-operative sensitivity of occlusal restorations using different dentin adhesives performed by an undergraduate and a post-doctorate dentist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-eight molar occlusal restorations were placed in 39 patients (ages between 18 and 30) using 3 different kind of adhesive systems; Optibond FL (OBF), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), and iBond (IB) by a post-doctorate dentist or a fifth-year dental student according to the manufacturers' instructions. Post-operative sensitivity to cold and air was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after 24 hours, 30, 90, and 180 days. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Post-operative sensitivity scores for OBF and CPB were higher for the dental student (P < 0.05), while IB scores did not differ statistical significantly according to the operator (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Operator skill and experience appears to play a role in determining the outcome of post-operative sensitivity of multi-step adhesive systems although the post-operative sensitivity was low. It is suggested that the less experienced clinicians (rather than experienced clinicians) should better use the self-etching dentin bonding systems with reduced application steps to minimize the potential risk of post-operative sensitivity of dental adhesives.

摘要

目的

评估一名本科生牙医和一名博士后牙医使用不同牙本质粘结剂进行咬合修复后的术后敏感性。

材料与方法

按照制造商的说明,由一名博士后牙医或一名五年级牙科学生,为39名年龄在18至30岁之间的患者的188颗磨牙进行咬合修复,使用3种不同的粘结剂系统:Optibond FL(OBF)、Clearfil Protect Bond(CPB)和iBond(IB)。在术后24小时、30天、90天和180天时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估对冷和空气的术后敏感性。数据采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Friedman检验进行分析(P<0.05)。

结果

牙科学生使用OBF和CPB的术后敏感性评分较高(P<0.05),而IB的评分根据操作者不同无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

尽管术后敏感性较低,但操作者的技术和经验似乎在决定多步骤粘结剂系统术后敏感性的结果中发挥作用。建议经验较少的临床医生(而非经验丰富的临床医生)应更好地使用应用步骤较少的自酸蚀牙本质粘结系统,以将牙科粘结剂术后敏感性的潜在风险降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dda/4054027/7ccd79b45c14/EJD-8-15-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验