Department of Cognitive Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 11;5:589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589. eCollection 2014.
Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been considerable discussion regarding gender and number, relatively little attention has focused on countability. Therefore, this article reviews empirical evidence for lexical-syntactic specification of nouns for countability. This includes evidence from studies of language production and comprehension with normal speakers and case studies which assess impairments of mass/count nouns in people with acquired brain damage. Current theories of language processing are reviewed and found to be lacking specification regarding countability. Subsequently, the theoretical implications of the empirical studies are discussed in the context of frameworks derived from these accounts of language production (Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1999) and comprehension (Taler and Jarema, 2006). The review concludes that there is empirical support for specification of nouns for countability at a lexical-syntactic level.
名词短语和句子的理解和/或生成需要选择名词的词汇-句法属性。这些词汇-句法属性包括语法性别(阳性/阴性/中性)、数(单数/复数)和可数性(物质/计数)。虽然已经有很多关于性别和数量的讨论,但相对较少关注可数性。因此,本文综述了名词可数性的词汇-句法特征的实证证据。这包括来自正常说话者语言产生和理解研究的证据,以及评估获得性脑损伤患者物质/计数名词障碍的个案研究。本文还回顾了语言处理的现有理论,并发现它们在可数性方面缺乏具体说明。随后,根据这些语言产生(Levelt,1989;Levelt 等人,1999)和理解(Taler 和 Jarema,2006)框架,讨论了实证研究的理论意义。综述的结论是,有实证支持在词汇-句法层面上对名词的可数性进行具体说明。