• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TEFTOM:一种有前景的通用创伤预期/结果测量方法——泛美踝关节和胫骨干骺端创伤患者验证研究的结果

TEFTOM: A Promising General Trauma Expectation/Outcome Measure-Results of a Validation Study on Pan-American Ankle and Distal Tibia Trauma Patients.

作者信息

Suk Michael, Daigl Monica, Buckley Richard E, Paccola Cleber A J, Lorich Dean G, Helfet David L, Hanson Beate

机构信息

Orthopaedic Trauma Service, College of Medicine Jacksonville, University of Florida, 655 West Eight St, 2nd Floor ACC, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.

Clinical Investigation and Documentation, AO Foundation, Stettbachstrasse 6, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

ISRN Orthop. 2013 Feb 28;2013:801784. doi: 10.1155/2013/801784. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1155/2013/801784
PMID:24967116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4045348/
Abstract

Background. In orthopedics, there is no instrument specifically designed to assess patients' expectations of their final surgery outcome in general trauma populations. We developed the Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcome Measure (TEFTOM) to investigate the fulfilment of patients' expectations one year after surgery as a measure of general trauma surgical outcomes. The aim of this paper was to assess the psychometric characteristics of this new general trauma outcome measure. Methods. The questionnaire was tested in 201 ankle and distal tibia fracture patients scheduled for surgery. Patients were followed up for twelve months. The TEFTOM questionnaire was evaluated for its criterion validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, and responsiveness. Results. TOM showed good criterion validity against the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Scale (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.69-0.77). Internal consistency was acceptable for TEF (Cronbach's alpha = 0.65-0.76) and excellent for TOM (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76-0.85). Reproducibility was moderate to very good (intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) ≥0.67) for TEF and very good (ICC ≥0.92) for TOM. TOM also proved to be responsive to changes in patients' condition over time (Wald test; P < 0.001). Conclusions. TEFTOM is a promising tool for measuring general trauma outcomes in terms of patients' expectation fulfilment that proved to be valid, internally consistent, reproducible, and responsive to change.

摘要

背景。在骨科领域,尚无专门设计用于评估普通创伤人群对最终手术结果期望的工具。我们开发了创伤期望因子创伤结果测量量表(TEFTOM),以调查患者术后一年期望的实现情况,作为普通创伤手术结果的一项衡量指标。本文旨在评估这一新的普通创伤结果测量量表的心理测量学特征。方法。该问卷在201例计划接受手术的踝关节和胫骨干骺端骨折患者中进行了测试。对患者进行了为期十二个月的随访。对TEFTOM问卷的效标效度、内部一致性、可重复性和反应性进行了评估。结果。与美国矫形外科医师学会足踝量表相比,TOM显示出良好的效标效度(皮尔逊相关系数 = 0.69 - 0.77)。TEF的内部一致性可接受(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.65 - 0.76),TOM的内部一致性极佳(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.76 - 0.85)。TEF的可重复性为中等至非常好(组内相关系数(ICC)≥0.67),TOM的可重复性非常好(ICC≥0.92)。TOM还被证明对患者病情随时间的变化有反应( Wald检验;P < 0.001)。结论。TEFTOM是一种很有前景的工具,可用于衡量普通创伤结果,即患者期望的实现情况,且已证明其有效、内部一致、可重复且对变化有反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/af6d4d5486fb/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/9bd75901110c/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/bdb530d6d2b2/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/af6d4d5486fb/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/9bd75901110c/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/bdb530d6d2b2/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e5/4045348/af6d4d5486fb/ISRN.ORTHOPEDICS2013-801784.003.jpg

相似文献

1
TEFTOM: A Promising General Trauma Expectation/Outcome Measure-Results of a Validation Study on Pan-American Ankle and Distal Tibia Trauma Patients.TEFTOM:一种有前景的通用创伤预期/结果测量方法——泛美踝关节和胫骨干骺端创伤患者验证研究的结果
ISRN Orthop. 2013 Feb 28;2013:801784. doi: 10.1155/2013/801784. eCollection 2013.
2
Evaluation of an expectation and outcome measurement questionnaire in ankle fracture patients: The Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcomes Measure (TEFTOM) Eurasia study.踝关节骨折患者预期与结果测量问卷的评估:创伤预期因素创伤结果测量(TEFTOM)欧亚研究。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(1):2309499019890140. doi: 10.1177/2309499019890140.
3
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.美国矫形外科医师学会足踝问卷韩文版的效度、信度和反应度
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):46-50. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Simplified Chinese version of hip and knee replacement expectations surveys in patients with osteoarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: cross-cultural adaptation, validation and reliability.骨关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者髋膝关节置换期望调查的简体中文版:跨文化调适、验证及信度分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 21;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2129-0.
6
The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; translation and validation of the Dutch language version for ankle fractures.美国足踝矫形外科学会踝关节-后足评分量表;荷兰语版踝关节骨折评分量表的翻译与验证
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e017040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017040.
7
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale: A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study from Iran.美国矫形足踝协会踝-后足评分量表:来自伊朗的跨文化调适与验证研究
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jun;24(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Patient expectations predict outcomes following distal radius fracture: a prospective cohort study using the TEFTOM questionnaire.患者期望可预测桡骨远端骨折的预后:使用 TEFTOM 问卷的前瞻性队列研究。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):877-882. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.091. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures.瑞典语版的 OMAS 是一种可靠且有效的踝关节骨折患者的结局测量工具。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 25;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109.
10
Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders.中文简体版功能性踝关节不稳识别问卷的汉化、适用性及心理测量学评价在慢性踝关节不稳患者中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 25;21(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03314-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Rural Trauma Team Development on the Outcomes of Motorcycle Accident-Related Injuries (Motor Registry Project): Protocol for a Multicenter Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.农村创伤小组发展对摩托车事故相关伤害结局的影响(摩托车登记项目):一项多中心整群随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 7;13:e55297. doi: 10.2196/55297.
2
Evaluation of Patient Expectations and Outcomes after Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端骨折后患者期望与治疗结果的评估
Hand (N Y). 2024 Apr 12:15589447241243063. doi: 10.1177/15589447241243063.
3
Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties.

本文引用的文献

1
Accountability measures--using measurement to promote quality improvement.问责措施——利用衡量来促进质量改进。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):683-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1002320. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
2
FDA guidance on patient reported outcomes.美国食品药品监督管理局关于患者报告结局的指南。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 21;340:c2921. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2921.
3
Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty.满足患者对全髋关节置换术的期望。
踝关节骨折:患者报告结局测量及其测量特性的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):27-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03166-3. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
4
Determinants of functional outcome following ankle fracture.踝关节骨折后功能预后的决定因素。
OTA Int. 2021 Jul 21;4(3):e139. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000139. eCollection 2021 Sep.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2073-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01802.
4
Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.患者报告结局在临床实践中的应用。
Lancet. 2009 Aug 1;374(9687):369-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61400-8.
5
Quality measurement in orthopaedics: the purchasers' view.骨科质量测量:购买方的观点。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2548-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0999-z. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
6
Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes.衡量患者的体验与结果。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 2;339:b2495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2495.
7
Healthcare quality measurement in orthopaedic surgery: current state of the art.骨科手术中的医疗质量评估:当前技术水平
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2542-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0840-8. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
8
New outcome measures are to be introduced in four types of surgery.
BMJ. 2009 Feb 16;338:b648. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b648.
9
Patient reported outcome measures in trials.试验中的患者报告结局指标
BMJ. 2009 Jan 12;338:a2597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2597.
10
NHS goes to the PROMS.英国国家医疗服务体系采用患者报告结局指标。
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1464-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39618.627951.80.