Wang Chen, Zhang Chen, Liu De-Lin, Tong Wen-Wen, He Chong-Ru, Huang Xuan, Xu Wei-Dong
Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 21;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2129-0.
The Hospital for Special Surgery Hip Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-THRES) and Knee Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-TKRES) are widely used tools developed to assess patients' preoperative expectations for total hip and knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to translate and adapt the HSS-THRES and HSS-TKRES into Chinese versions (SC-THRES/TKRES) and evaluate their psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Patients scheduled for total hip (104 hip OA and 51 AS) or knee replacements (101 knee OA) were recruited in this study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate structural validity. The internal consistency was assessed by the Cronbach's α coefficient. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. The construct validity was analyzed by evaluating the correlations between SC-THRES/TKRES and the Expectation WOMAC. The correlations with the Expectation WOMAC were tested against our hypotheses. We additionally compared preoperative expectations of AS patients to those of hip OA patients.
The results of CFA for the SC-THRES and SC-TKRES demonstrated good fit. The results for the SC-THRES/TKRES revealed good test-retest reliability and good internal consistency (AS: ICC = 0.893, Cronbach's α = 0.815; hip OA: ICC = 0.878, Cronbach's α = 0.814; knee OA: ICC = 0.806, Cronbach's α = 0.808). The correlations between the SC-THRES/TKRES and the Expectation WOMAC were moderate (0.541 for AS, 0.490 for hip OA and 0.465 for knee OA), which were consistent with the hypotheses.
The SC-THRES/TKRES are reliable, valid for the evaluation of Chinese patients with OA and AS undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. The surveys can be used as part of preoperative assessments. Meanwhile, additional research is needed to replicate these findings and to assess the content validity in a larger sample.
特种外科医院髋关节置换期望调查(HSS - THRES)和膝关节置换期望调查(HSS - TKRES)是为评估患者对全髋关节和膝关节置换术的术前期望而开发的广泛使用的工具。本研究旨在将HSS - THRES和HSS - TKRES翻译成中文版本(SC - THRES/TKRES),并评估其在骨关节炎(OA)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者中的心理测量特性。
本研究招募了计划进行全髋关节置换(104例髋关节OA和51例AS)或膝关节置换(101例膝关节OA)的患者。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。通过Cronbach'sα系数评估内部一致性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度。通过评估SC - THRES/TKRES与期望WOMAC之间的相关性来分析构想效度。针对我们的假设测试了与期望WOMAC的相关性。我们还比较了AS患者与髋关节OA患者的术前期望。
SC - THRES和SC - TKRES的CFA结果显示拟合良好。SC - THRES/TKRES的结果显示出良好的重测信度和良好的内部一致性(AS:ICC = 0.893,Cronbach'sα = 0.815;髋关节OA:ICC = 0.878,Cronbach'sα = 0.814;膝关节OA:ICC = 0.806,Cronbach'sα = 0.808)。SC - THRES/TKRES与期望WOMAC之间的相关性为中等(AS为0.541,髋关节OA为0.490,膝关节OA为0.465),这与假设一致。
SC - THRES/TKRES可靠,对于评估接受全髋关节和膝关节置换术的中国OA和AS患者有效。这些调查可作为术前评估的一部分。同时,需要进一步的研究来重复这些发现并在更大的样本中评估内容效度。