Kleynen Melanie, Braun Susy M, Bleijlevens Michel H, Lexis Monique A, Rasquin Sascha M, Halfens Jos, Wilson Mark R, Beurskens Anna J, Masters Rich S W
Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of people with a chronic illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Adelante Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Brain Injury, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands.
Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of people with a chronic illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e100227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100227. eCollection 2014.
Motor learning is central to domains such as sports and rehabilitation; however, often terminologies are insufficiently uniform to allow effective sharing of experience or translation of knowledge. A study using a Delphi technique was conducted to ascertain level of agreement between experts from different motor learning domains (i.e., therapists, coaches, researchers) with respect to definitions and descriptions of a fundamental conceptual distinction within motor learning, namely implicit and explicit motor learning.
A Delphi technique was embedded in multiple rounds of a survey designed to collect and aggregate informed opinions of 49 international respondents with expertise related to motor learning. The survey was administered via an online survey program and accompanied by feedback after each round. Consensus was considered to be reached if ≥70% of the experts agreed on a topic.
Consensus was reached with respect to definitions of implicit and explicit motor learning, and seven common primary intervention strategies were identified in the context of implicit and explicit motor learning. Consensus was not reached with respect to whether the strategies promote implicit or explicit forms of learning.
The definitions and descriptions agreed upon may aid translation and transfer of knowledge between domains in the field of motor learning. Empirical and clinical research is required to confirm the accuracy of the definitions and to explore the feasibility of the strategies that were identified in research, everyday practice and education.
运动学习是体育和康复等领域的核心内容;然而,相关术语往往不够统一,无法有效地分享经验或传播知识。本研究采用德尔菲技术,以确定来自不同运动学习领域(即治疗师、教练、研究人员)的专家在运动学习中一个基本概念区分(即内隐和外显运动学习)的定义和描述方面的一致程度。
将德尔菲技术融入多轮调查中,旨在收集和汇总49名具有运动学习相关专业知识的国际受访者的专业意见。该调查通过在线调查程序进行,每轮调查后都会提供反馈。如果≥70%的专家对某个主题达成一致,则认为达成了共识。
在内隐和外显运动学习的定义方面达成了共识,并在内隐和外显运动学习的背景下确定了七种常见的主要干预策略。但在这些策略是促进内隐还是外显学习形式方面未达成共识。
所达成一致的定义和描述可能有助于运动学习领域不同专业之间的知识转化和传播。需要进行实证研究和临床研究,以确认这些定义的准确性,并探索在研究、日常实践和教育中所确定策略的可行性。