Suppr超能文献

混淆效价和唤醒:政治取向的真正基础是什么?

Confounding valence and arousal: What really underlies political orientation?

机构信息

University of Toronto Scarborough,Department of Psychology,Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4,

Department of Psychology,University of Toronto,Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3,

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):330-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002744.

Abstract

The negative valence model of political orientation proposed by Hibbing et al. is comprehensive and thought-provoking. We agree that there is compelling research linking threat to conservative political beliefs. However, we propose that further research is needed before it can be concluded that negative valence, rather than arousal more generally, underlies the psychological motivations to endorse conservative political belief.

摘要

希宾等人提出的政治倾向负效价模型是全面且发人深省的。我们同意,有大量研究表明威胁与保守政治信仰有关。然而,我们认为,在得出负效价(而不是更普遍的唤醒)是支持保守政治信仰的心理动机的结论之前,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

5
Negativity bias, emotion targets, and emotion systems.负面偏差、情绪目标和情绪系统。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):314-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002586.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验