Department of Psychology,New York University,New York,NY
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):317-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002616.
A comprehensive review by Hibbing et al. establishes close links between physiological and psychological responses and ideological preferences. However, existing research cannot resolve the "chicken-and-egg problem" in political neuroscience: Which is cause and which is effect? We consider the possibility, which they reject, that general ideological postures, if consistently adopted, could shape psychological and physiological functioning.
由 Hibbing 等人进行的一项全面综述确立了生理和心理反应与意识形态偏好之间的紧密联系。然而,现有研究无法解决政治神经科学中的“先有鸡还是先有蛋”问题:哪个是原因,哪个是结果?我们考虑了一种可能性,即他们所拒绝的,即如果一贯采取一般的意识形态姿态,可能会塑造心理和生理功能。