Venuleo Claudia, Salvatore Sergio, Mossi Piergiorgio
Department of History, Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Via Stampacchia, 45, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1353-76. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9476-z.
It is recognised that cultural factors play a role in the onset and continuation of several mental health problems. However, there is a significant lack of empirical studies investigating the relationships between cultural factors and gambling behavior. This study assessed whether the subjective cultures through which subjects interpret and enact their experience of the social environment play a major role in increasing (or decreasing) the probability of pathological gambling. Participants, recruited in three different contexts (public health services for the treatment of addiction, casino, undergraduate course) were subjected to the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) (Lesieur and Blume in Am J Psychiatry 144(9):1184-1188, 1987), in order to identify a group of pathological gamblers-and with the Questionnaire on the Interpretation of the Social Environment (QUISE) (Mossi and Salvatore in Eur J Educ Psychol 4(2):153-169, 2011)-in order to detect their subjective cultures. The study compares pathological group (scoring >5 on SOGS, n = 34) and a healthy control group (scoring <1 on SOGS, n = 35). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare groups on QUISE scores of subjective culture. Moreover, a logistic regression was applied in order to esteem the capability of the QUISE scores to differentiate between pathological gamblers and control. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that pathological group expresses different subjective cultures compared with no gambler subjects. The theoretical and clinical implications of the results are discussed.
人们认识到文化因素在几种心理健康问题的发生和持续中发挥作用。然而,实证研究严重缺乏,未能探究文化因素与赌博行为之间的关系。本研究评估了受试者用以解释和践行其社会环境体验的主观文化,在增加(或减少)病理性赌博可能性方面是否起主要作用。在三种不同背景(成瘾治疗公共卫生服务机构、赌场、本科课程)招募的参与者接受了南橡树赌博筛查量表(SOGS)(Lesieur和Blume,《美国精神病学杂志》,1987年,第144卷,第9期,第1184 - 1188页),以识别一组病理性赌徒;并接受了社会环境解释问卷(QUISE)(Mossi和Salvatore,《欧洲教育心理学杂志》,2011年,第4卷,第2期,第153 - 169页),以检测他们的主观文化。该研究比较了病理性组(SOGS得分>5,n = 34)和健康对照组(SOGS得分<1,n = 35)。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较两组在主观文化QUISE得分上的差异。此外,应用逻辑回归来评估QUISE得分区分病理性赌徒和对照组的能力。结果与病理性组与非赌博受试者相比表达不同主观文化的假设一致。讨论了结果的理论和临床意义。