• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理性赌博者和偏好机会或技巧游戏的非病理性赌博者在认知扭曲方面的差异。

Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.B. 7807, 5020, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2010 Dec;26(4):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6
PMID:20169466
Abstract

Cognitive distortions have been thought to play an important role in the development and maintenance of pathological gambling. The present study investigated whether severity of gambling problems and gamblers' preference for chance or skill games were related to two sub-factors of cognitive distortions as measured by the Gamblers Belief Questionnaire: Luck/Perseverance, which reflects an individual's perception that chance is favorable to him/her, and Illusion of Control, which reflects an individual's perception that his/her behavior influences chance occurrences. Participants (N = 166) were recruited from a race track (n = 79), off-course betting facilities (n = 50) and from an online treatment program for problem gamblers (n = 49). Gambling severity was measured by the South Oaks Gambling Screen, and 73 were classified as pathological gamblers whereas 93 were classified as non-pathological gamblers. The present study supports previous proposals that cognitive distortions are core processes related to gambling behavior as pathological gamblers reported more cognitive distortions than did non-pathological gamblers. A preference for skill games was also associated with greater Illusion of Control compared to a preference for chance games. For gamblers preferring skill games there were no differences in Luck/Perseverance or Illusion of Control between pathological and non-pathological gamblers.

摘要

认知扭曲被认为在病理性赌博的发展和维持中起着重要作用。本研究调查了赌博问题的严重程度和赌徒对机会游戏或技巧游戏的偏好是否与赌博者信念问卷(Gamblers Belief Questionnaire)测量的认知扭曲的两个亚因素有关:运气/坚持,反映了个体对自己有利的机会的看法;控制错觉,反映了个体对自己的行为影响机会的看法。参与者(N=166)是从赛马场(n=79)、场外投注设施(n=50)和在线赌博问题治疗计划(n=49)招募的。赌博严重程度由南方奥克斯赌博筛查量表(South Oaks Gambling Screen)测量,其中 73 人被归类为病理性赌徒,93 人被归类为非病理性赌徒。本研究支持先前的假设,即认知扭曲是与赌博行为相关的核心过程,因为病理性赌徒报告的认知扭曲比非病理性赌徒多。对技巧游戏的偏好也与更大的控制错觉有关,而不是与对机会游戏的偏好有关。对于喜欢技巧游戏的赌徒来说,病理性和非病理性赌徒在运气/坚持或控制错觉方面没有差异。

相似文献

1
Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.病理性赌博者和偏好机会或技巧游戏的非病理性赌博者在认知扭曲方面的差异。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Dec;26(4):561-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.
2
The role of gambling type on gambling motives, cognitive distortions, and gambling severity in gamblers recruited online.网络招募赌徒中赌博类型对赌博动机、认知扭曲和赌博严重程度的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0238978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238978. eCollection 2020.
3
Cognitive Distortions in Gamblers and Non-gamblers of a Representative Spanish Sample.代表性西班牙样本中赌徒和非赌徒的认知扭曲。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):207-222. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09870-z.
4
Cognitive Distortions of Patients in the Gambling Addicts' Club - Differences with Regard to Age and Length of Treatment.赌博成瘾者俱乐部患者的认知扭曲——与年龄和治疗时间的差异。
Psychiatr Danub. 2019 Sep;31(3):316-324. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2019.316.
5
Gambling Motives: Do They Explain Cognitive Distortions in Male Poker Gamblers?赌博动机:它们能否解释男性扑克赌徒的认知扭曲?
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Mar;34(1):133-145. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9700-8.
6
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report.参加英国国家问题赌博诊所的病态赌徒的冲动和认知扭曲:初步报告。
Psychol Med. 2011 Dec;41(12):2625-35. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100095X. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
An Assessment of the Validity of the Gamblers Belief Questionnaire. gamblers belief questionnaire 有效性评估
Addict Behav. 2019 Oct;97:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
Decision-Making, Cognitive Distortions and Alcohol Use in Adolescent Problem and Non-problem Gamblers: An Experimental Study.青少年问题赌徒和非问题赌徒的决策、认知扭曲与饮酒情况:一项实验研究
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Dec;32(4):1203-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9597-7.
9
The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.感知控制和过度自信在病态赌博中的作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2005 Winter;21(4):481-502. doi: 10.1007/s10899-005-5559-1.
10
Effectiveness of At-Risk Gamblers' Temporary Self-Exclusion from Internet Gambling Sites.有风险赌徒临时自我排除互联网赌博网站的效果。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):601-615. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9782-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediating Effect of Perceived Personal Luck in the Relationship Between Narcissism and Problem Gambling in Strategic Gamblers: An Exploratory Study.感知到的个人运气在策略性赌徒自恋与问题赌博关系中的中介作用:一项探索性研究
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Oct 2. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10360-0.
2
Gender Differences in Gambling Disorder: Results from an Italian Multicentric Study.赌博障碍中的性别差异:一项意大利多中心研究的结果
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Aug;21(4):313-322. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240407.
3
Neurophysiological Correlates of Near-Wins in Gambling: A Systematic Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Why gamblers fail to win: a review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling.赌徒为何无法获胜:病理性赌博的认知和神经影像学研究综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jan;34(1):87-107. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural interventions to reduce problem gambling: hedging our bets?系统评价和认知行为干预减少赌博问题的荟萃分析:我们在押注吗?
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jul;47(7):592-607. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
3
Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment.
赌博中险些获胜的神经生理学关联:一项系统文献综述
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):5-35. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10327-1. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Correlates of Gambling Behaviours Among Day Traders: Evidence from a National Study.日间交易员赌博行为的相关因素:一项全国性研究的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Mar;41(1):51-66. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10314-6. Epub 2024 May 14.
5
Non-problem gamblers show the same cognitive distortions while playing slot machines as problem gamblers, with no loss of control and reduced reality control, though - An experimental study on gambling.非问题赌徒在玩老虎机时表现出与问题赌徒相同的认知扭曲,不过他们没有失去控制,现实控制能力也没有降低——一项关于赌博的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 22;14:1175621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175621. eCollection 2023.
6
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Gamblers of East Asian Descent in Australia: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.澳大利亚东亚裔文化和语言多样化的赌徒:当前证据的综合回顾。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):947-969. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10202-5. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
7
Unambiguous evidence that over half of gambling problems in Australia are caused by electronic gambling machines: Results from a large-scale composite population study.明确证据表明,澳大利亚超过一半的赌博问题是由电子赌博机造成的:一项大规模综合人群研究的结果。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Feb 1;12(1):182-193. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00083. Print 2023 Mar 30.
8
Cognitive Factors that Predict Gambling Fallacy Endorsement.预测赌博谬误认可的认知因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):843-855. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10177-9. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
9
Do Online Gambling Products Require Traditional Therapy for Gambling Disorder to Change? Evidence from Focus Group Interviews with Mental Health Professionals Treating Online Gamblers.网络赌博产品是否需要传统的赌博障碍治疗方法来改变?对治疗网络赌徒的心理健康专业人员进行焦点小组访谈得出的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Jun;38(2):681-697. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10064-9. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
10
Langer's illusion of control and the cognitive model of disordered gambling.兰格的控制错觉与赌博障碍的认知模型。
Addiction. 2022 Apr;117(4):1146-1151. doi: 10.1111/add.15649. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
评估赌博功能评估的可靠性。
J Gambl Stud. 2009 Mar;25(1):121-9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9109-5. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
4
Association of cognitive distortions with problem and pathological gambling in adult male twins.成年男性双胞胎中认知扭曲与问题赌博及病态赌博的关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Sep 30;160(3):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.08.007. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
5
Subtyping pathological gamblers on the basis of affective motivations for gambling: relations to gambling problems, drinking problems, and affective motivations for drinking.基于赌博的情感动机对病态赌徒进行亚型分类:与赌博问题、饮酒问题及饮酒情感动机的关系
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Jun;22(2):257-68. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.257.
6
A Canadian population level analysis of the roles of irrational gambling cognitions and risky gambling practices as correlates of gambling intensity and pathological gambling.一项关于非理性赌博认知和高风险赌博行为作为赌博强度和病态赌博相关因素的加拿大人口水平分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Sep;24(3):257-74. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9089-5. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
7
Self-perceptions of dispositional luck: relationship to DSM gambling symptoms, subjective enjoyment of gambling and treatment readiness.特质性运气的自我认知:与DSM赌博症状、赌博主观享受度及治疗意愿的关系
Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(1):43-63. doi: 10.1080/10826080601094223.
8
Convergent validity of measures of cognitive distortions, impulsivity, and time perspective with pathological gambling.认知扭曲、冲动性及时间观念测量与病态赌博的聚合效度。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):75-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.75.
9
Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness?体育博彩:赌徒能战胜随机性吗?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2004 Jun;18(2):143-7. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.2.143.
10
Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure.在延迟折扣程序中,病理性赌博严重程度与冲动性相关。
Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):345-354. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00150-5.