Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;307(4):G437-44. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00148.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
We aimed to model esophageal bolus transit based on esophageal pressure topography (EPT) landmarks, concurrent intrabolus pressure (IBP), and esophageal diameter as defined with fluoroscopy. Ten healthy subjects were studied with high-resolution impedance manometry and videofluoroscopy. Data from four 5-ml barium swallows (2 upright, 2 supine) in each subject were analyzed. EPT landmarks were utilized to divide bolus transit into four phases: phase I, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening; phase II, UES closure to the transition zone (TZ); phase III, TZ to contractile deceleration point (CDP); and phase IV, CDP to completion of bolus emptying. IBP and esophageal diameter were analyzed to define functional differences among phases. IBP exhibited distinct changes during the four phases of bolus transit. Phase I was associated with filling via passive dilatation of the esophagus and IBP reflective of intrathoracic pressure. Phase II was associated with auxotonic relaxation and compartmentalization of the bolus distal to the TZ. During phase III, IBP exhibited a slow increase with loss of volume related to peristalsis (auxotonic contraction) and passive dilatation in the distal esophagus. Phase IV was associated with the highest IBP and exhibited isometric contraction during periods of nonemptying and auxotonic contraction during emptying. IBP may be used as a marker of esophageal wall state during the four phases of esophageal bolus transit. Thus abnormalities in IBP may identify subtypes of esophageal disease attributable to abnormal distensibility or neuromuscular dysfunction.
我们旨在基于食管压力图(EPT)标志、同步内压(IBP)和荧光透视定义的食管直径来对食管食团转运进行建模。研究了 10 名健康受试者,他们接受了高分辨率阻抗测压和荧光透视检查。对每位受试者的 4 次 5ml 钡剂吞咽(2 次直立,2 次仰卧)的数据进行了分析。利用 EPT 标志将食团转运分为四个阶段:阶段 I,上食管括约肌(UES)开放;阶段 II,UES 关闭至过渡区(TZ);阶段 III,TZ 至收缩减速点(CDP);阶段 IV,CDP 至食团排空完成。分析 IBP 和食管直径以定义各阶段之间的功能差异。IBP 在食团转运的四个阶段表现出明显变化。阶段 I 与食管的被动扩张充盈有关,IBP 反映胸腔内压力。阶段 II 与辅助松弛和 TZ 远端食团的分隔有关。在阶段 III 期间,IBP 随着蠕动相关的容积减少而缓慢增加,同时远端食管表现出被动扩张(辅助收缩)。阶段 IV 与 IBP 最高相关,在非排空期间表现出等距收缩,在排空期间表现出辅助收缩。IBP 可作为食管食团转运四个阶段食管壁状态的标志物。因此,IBP 的异常可能会识别出归因于异常可扩张性或神经肌肉功能障碍的食管疾病亚型。