Petersen Andreas Munk, Mirsepasi Hengameh, Halkjær Sofie Ingdam, Mortensen Esben Munk, Nordgaard-Lassen Inge, Krogfelt Karen Angeliki
Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 Nov;8(11):1498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) has been used to maintain and induce clinical remission in UC. Our aim was to test the effect of Ciprofloxacin and/or orally administered EcN as add-on to conventional therapies in patients with active UC.
Our single center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled study included patients with a Colitis Activity Index (CAI) score of at least 6. Patients were randomized to Ciprofloxacin or placebo for 1week followed by EcN or placebo for 7weeks. All 4 treatments were given as add-on treatments.
One hundred subjects with active UC were recruited. In the per-protocol analysis we, surprisingly, found that in the group receiving placebo/EcN fewer patients, 54%, reached remission compared to the group receiving placebo/placebo, 89%, p<0.05. Among patients treated with Cipro/placebo and Cipro/EcN, 78% and 66% reached remission, respectively. Furthermore, the group receiving placebo/EcN had the largest number of withdrawals, 11 of 25 (44%), compared to 15 of 75 (20%) in any of the other groups, p<0.05. Indication of lack of mucosal healing was found in the group treated with placebo/Nissle, since only 4 (29%) of the 14 patients, who completed the study, reported no blood in stools at week 12 (p<0.02), compared to 63%, 67% and 65% in groups treated with Cipro/Nissle, Cipro/placebo and placebo/placebo, respectively.
Our data suggest that there is no benefit in the use of E. coli Nissle as an add-on treatment to conventional therapies for active ulcerative colitis. Furthermore, treatment with E. coli Nissle without a previous antibiotic cure resulted in fewer patients reaching clinical remission.
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是一种慢性炎症性肠病。益生菌大肠杆菌Nissle 1917(EcN)已被用于维持和诱导UC患者的临床缓解。我们的目的是测试环丙沙星和/或口服EcN作为活动性UC患者常规治疗补充剂的效果。
我们的单中心双盲随机安慰剂对照研究纳入了结肠炎活动指数(CAI)评分至少为6的患者。患者被随机分为接受环丙沙星或安慰剂治疗1周,随后接受EcN或安慰剂治疗7周。所有4种治疗均作为补充治疗给予。
招募了100名活动性UC患者。在符合方案分析中,令人惊讶的是,我们发现接受安慰剂/EcN组达到缓解的患者较少,为54%,而接受安慰剂/安慰剂组为89%,p<0.05。在接受环丙沙星/安慰剂和环丙沙星/EcN治疗的患者中,分别有78%和66%达到缓解。此外,接受安慰剂/EcN组的退出人数最多,25人中有11人(44%),而其他任何组中75人中有15人(20%),p<0.05。在接受安慰剂/ Nissle治疗的组中发现缺乏黏膜愈合的迹象,因为在完成研究的14名患者中,只有4人(29%)在第12周报告无便血(p<0.02),而在接受环丙沙星/ Nissle、环丙沙星/安慰剂和安慰剂/安慰剂治疗的组中分别为63%、67%和65%。
我们的数据表明,对于活动性溃疡性结肠炎,使用大肠杆菌Nissle作为常规治疗的补充治疗没有益处。此外,在没有先前抗生素治疗的情况下用大肠杆菌Nissle治疗导致达到临床缓解的患者较少。