Suppr超能文献

呼吸道标本革兰氏染色在排除呼吸机相关性肺炎中金黄色葡萄球菌方面的准确性。

The accuracy of Gram stain of respiratory specimens in excluding Staphylococcus aureus in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

作者信息

Gottesman Tamar, Yossepowitch Orit, Lerner Evgenia, Schwartz-Harari Orna, Soroksky Arie, Yekutieli Daniel, Dan Michael

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Unit, E. Wolfson Hospital, Holon 58100, Israel.

Microbiology Laboratory, E. Wolfson Hospital, Holon 58100, Israel.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):739-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 May 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Gram stain of deep tracheal aspirate as a tool to direct empiric antibiotic therapy, and more specifically as a tool to exclude the need for empiric antibiotic coverage against Staphylococcus aureus in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DESIGN

A prospective, single-center, observational, cohort study.

SETTING

All wards at a community hospital.

PATIENTS

Adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation, identified as having VAP in a 54-month prospective surveillance database.

INTERVENTIONS

Sampling of lower airway secretions by deep endotracheal aspiration was taken from each patient who developed VAP. Samples were sent immediately for Gram stain and qualitative bacterial cultures. Demographic and relevant clinical data were collected; Gram stain, culture, and antibiotic susceptibility results were documented; and outcome was followed prospectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The analysis included 114 consecutive patients with 115 episodes of VAP from June 2007 to January 2012. Sensitivity of Gram stain compared with culture was 90.47% for gram-positive cocci, 69.6% for gram-negative rods, and 50% for sterile cultures. Specificity was 82.5%, 77.8%, and 79%, respectively. Negative predictive value was high for gram-positive cocci (97%) and sterile cultures (96%) but low for gram-negative rods (20%). Acinetobacter baumanii (45%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (38 %) were the prevailing isolates. S aureus was found in 18.3% of the patients. Most isolates were multiresistant.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of gram-positive bacteria on Gram stain had a high negative predictive value. These data can be used to narrow the initial empiric antibiotic regimen and to avoid unnecessary exposure of patients to vancomycin and other antistaphyloccocal agents.

摘要

目的

评估深部气管吸出物革兰氏染色作为指导经验性抗生素治疗的工具,更具体地说,作为排除在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)中对金黄色葡萄球菌进行经验性抗生素覆盖必要性的工具。

设计

一项前瞻性、单中心、观察性队列研究。

地点

一家社区医院的所有病房。

患者

在一个为期54个月的前瞻性监测数据库中被确定患有VAP的需要机械通气的成年患者。

干预措施

对每例发生VAP的患者通过深部气管内吸引采集下呼吸道分泌物样本。样本立即送检进行革兰氏染色和定性细菌培养。收集人口统计学和相关临床数据;记录革兰氏染色、培养及抗生素敏感性结果;并对结局进行前瞻性随访。

测量指标及主要结果

分析纳入了2007年6月至2012年1月期间114例连续患者发生的115次VAP发作。革兰氏染色与培养相比,革兰氏阳性球菌的敏感性为90.47%,革兰氏阴性杆菌为69.6%,无菌培养为50%。特异性分别为82.5%、77.8%和79%。革兰氏阳性球菌(97%)和无菌培养(96%)的阴性预测值较高,但革兰氏阴性杆菌的阴性预测值较低(20%)。鲍曼不动杆菌(45%)和铜绿假单胞菌(38%)是主要分离株。18.3%的患者中发现了金黄色葡萄球菌。大多数分离株具有多重耐药性。

结论

革兰氏染色未发现革兰氏阳性菌具有较高的阴性预测值。这些数据可用于缩小初始经验性抗生素治疗方案范围,并避免患者不必要地暴露于万古霉素和其他抗葡萄球菌药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验