Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan.
Department of Advanced Acute Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuoho-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 467-0001, Japan.
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 19;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1747-5.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious problem in intensive care units (ICUs). Several studies have suggested that the Gram stain of endotracheal aspirates is a useful method for accurately diagnosing VAP. However, the usefulness of the Gram stain in predicting which microorganisms cause VAP has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a Gram stain of endotracheal aspirates could be used to determine appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy for VAP.
Data on consecutive episodes of microbiologically confirmed VAP were collected from February 2013 to February 2016 in the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Japan. We constructed two hypothetical empirical antimicrobial treatment algorithms for VAP: a guidelines-based algorithm (GLBA) based on the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society-Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS-IDSA) guidelines and a Gram stain-based algorithm (GSBA) which limited the choice of initial antimicrobials according to the results of bedside Gram stains. The GLBA and the GSBA were retrospectively reviewed for each VAP episode. The initial coverage rates and the selection of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents were compared between the two algorithms.
During the study period, 219 suspected VAP episodes were observed and 131 episodes were assessed for analysis. Appropriate antimicrobial coverage rates were not significantly different between the two algorithms (GLBA 95.4% versus GSBA 92.4%; p = 0.134). The number of episodes for which antimethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents were selected as an initial treatment was larger in the GLBA than in the GSBA (71.0% versus 31.3%; p < 0.001), as were the number of episodes for which antipseudomonal agents were recommended as an initial treatment (70.2% versus 51.9%; p < 0.001).
Antimicrobial treatment based on Gram stain results may restrict the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents without increasing the risk of treatment failure.
UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026457 . Registered 8 March 2017 (retrospectively registered).
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是重症监护病房(ICU)中常见且严重的问题。几项研究表明,气管内吸出物的革兰氏染色是一种准确诊断 VAP 的有用方法。然而,革兰氏染色在预测哪些微生物引起 VAP 方面的有用性尚未确定。本研究旨在评估气管内吸出物的革兰氏染色是否可用于确定 VAP 的适当初始抗菌治疗。
从 2013 年 2 月至 2016 年 2 月,在日本一家三级保健医院的 ICU 连续收集了微生物确诊的 VAP 病例。我们构建了两种假设的 VAP 经验性抗菌治疗算法:一种是基于美国胸科学会-传染病学会(ATS-IDSA)指南建议的基于指南的算法(GLBA),另一种是根据床边革兰氏染色结果限制初始抗菌药物选择的基于革兰氏染色的算法(GSBA)。对每个 VAP 病例进行 GLBA 和 GSBA 的回顾性审查。比较两种算法的初始覆盖率和广谱抗菌药物的选择。
在研究期间,观察到 219 例疑似 VAP 发作,对 131 例发作进行了评估。两种算法的抗菌覆盖率无显著差异(GLBA 95.4%对 GSBA 92.4%;p=0.134)。GLBA 选择耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌药物作为初始治疗的病例数多于 GSBA(71.0%对 31.3%;p<0.001),GLBA 推荐使用抗假单胞菌药物作为初始治疗的病例数也多于 GSBA(70.2%对 51.9%;p<0.001)。
基于革兰氏染色结果的抗菌治疗可能会限制广谱抗菌药物的使用,而不会增加治疗失败的风险。
UMIN-CTR,UMIN000026457。于 2017 年 3 月 8 日注册(回顾性注册)。